Will Trump’s New "Gold Card" Visa Replace the Long-Standing EB-5 Program?

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

President Trump announced a $5M gold card visa on February 26, 2025, potentially replacing the EB-5 Investor Program.
Gold card lacks EB-5’s job creation requirements, offers corporate sponsorships, and imposes significantly higher investment thresholds.
EB-5 remains operational with $1.8M/$900K thresholds, 10-job mandates, and regional allocations; legislative approval needed for changes.

President Donald Trump has once again shifted headlines within immigration policy circles by introducing a potential overhaul of one of the United States’ cornerstone investor visa programs. On February 26, 2025, he and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick unveiled a plan for a new “gold card” visa initiative, which they hinted could ultimately replace the long-standing EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

The proposed framework has sparked debate, with skeptics and supporters analyzing its broader implications for immigrant investors, corporate entities, and the future of American immigration policies. What sets the gold card visa apart, and will it indeed displace the EB-5 program? Here’s an in-depth look at the details, comparisons, and potential outcomes.

Will Trump’s New "Gold Card" Visa Replace the Long-Standing EB-5 Program? — Will Trump’s New “Gold Card” Visa Replace the Long-Standing EB-5 Program?

What Is the Gold Card Visa?

The gold card visa is a new immigration concept designed to attract exceptionally wealthy foreign investors. Under this program, applicants would qualify for U.S. residency by contributing an investment of $5 million into the economy. This amount substantially surpasses the current thresholds outlined within the EB-5 program.

President Trump touted the gold card as a way to prioritize economic contributions and encourage “people with money and people that create jobs” to immigrate to the country. However, unlike the EB-5 visa, the gold card program’s announcement did not include specific employment creation goals. Commerce Secretary Lutnick elaborated that gold card applicants would undergo stringent vetting, with policies aimed at recruiting “wonderful, world-class global citizens.”

There is also a corporate-facing component to the proposal. Companies could theoretically “purchase” residency on behalf of their highly skilled or exceptionally educated employees, streamlining immigration processes for global talent.

The introduction of this visa raises a fundamental question for the U.S. immigration system: could the gold card visa be an evolution that supersedes the EB-5 visa altogether?

The EB-5 Program in Focus

The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, operating since 1990, has long served as an attractive route for foreign nationals to secure residency in the United States by investing in the domestic economy. Applicants are currently required to meet one of two financial thresholds:

Standard Investment: $1.8 million in any qualifying U.S. business.
Targeted Employment Area (TEA) Investment: A reduced $900,000 investment for rural or high-unemployment areas.

Additionally, EB-5 applicants must ensure their funds will create or preserve at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers. The program yearly grants a maximum of 10,650 visas and allocates specific percentages to incentivize investments in strategic regions:

20% for Rural Areas
10% for High Unemployment Areas
2% for Infrastructure Projects

As part of its regulations, the EB-5 program also specifies that regional centers—entities approved to pool investor funds for large-scale development projects—play a significant role in facilitating the investments.

However, despite its appeal, the program has its detractors. Amendments implemented in 2019, which nearly doubled the required investment amounts, have narrowed its accessibility. Processing timelines further complicate matters, especially for backlogged applicants from nations like China 🇨🇳 and India 🇮🇳.

Comparing the Gold Card Visa and EB-5 Program

The announcement of the gold card visa introduces several pivotal differences when compared to its predecessor, the EB-5 program:

Investment Threshold
At $5 million, the gold card visa’s minimum investment requirement dwarfs even the highest EB-5 tier ($1.8 million for standard areas). This significant leap could narrow the pool of eligible applicants even further, focusing the program on ultra-high net worth individuals alone.
Employment Creation Mandates
The EB-5 program explicitly mandates at least 10 full-time U.S. jobs be created or maintained. This job-creation requirement is conspicuously absent from the gold card proposal.
Geographic Priorities
The EB-5 program incentivizes investments in rural and high-unemployment U.S. regions through its TEA tier. Conversely, the gold card announcement has yet to confirm whether applicants would face any geographic restrictions on their investments.
Corporate Sponsorships
A particularly unique aspect of the gold card visa is its corporate residency offer. No such option exists in the EB-5 framework.
Visa Allocation
The EB-5 program operates on predefined quotas and prioritization criteria (e.g., rural allocations), whereas specifics on gold card visa quotas remain opaque.

These differences signal that the gold card visa emphasizes wealth concentration over other economic priorities, such as job creation and regional equity.

Unanswered Questions and Legislative Hurdles

While the gold card visa generates headlines, its future remains far from certain. Congress holds significant sway over its fate, as modifying or altogether replacing the EB-5 program requires legislative approval. For context, Congress initially passed the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program in 1990 and extended it for another five years in 2022. Future adjustments to this foundational program pose substantial procedural challenges.

Beyond legislative battles, a host of logistical concerns surround the transition from EB-5 to the gold card visa. Chief among them is uncertainty over how existing EB-5 applications—some caught in extended backlogs—would be processed if the program were to sunset. Similarly, no mention has yet been made about the role regional centers might play under the proposed gold card framework.

Global Implications of the Shift

While the U.S. routinely assesses its immigration policies for alignment with economic goals, President Trump’s gold card visa proposal reflects broader trends reshaping investment migration worldwide. Countries like Portugal 🇵🇹 and the United Arab Emirates 🇦🇪 offer competing “golden” visas targeting wealthier classes, illustrating a global race to attract high-net-worth individuals.

Nonetheless, a $5 million threshold signals exclusivity that diverges sharply from the EB-5’s more accessible approach. Investors looking to secure U.S. residency might find alternative options, potentially opting for other nations with less demanding investment thresholds.

At the domestic level, U.S.-bound investors could face steeper barriers to entry, limiting opportunities for middle-class foreign entrepreneurs aiming to leverage pathways such as the EB-5.

Where Do We Stand Now?

As of February 2025, the EB-5 visa program remains operational. In fact, as VisaVerge.com reports, the allocation of EB-5 visas across categories like rural and high-unemployment areas continues to meet increasing demand. Meanwhile, reserved visa categories for fiscal year 2025 are entirely “current,” affording applicants from eligible nations broader access to the program.

This status quo may persist for months—if not years—depending on how Congress and various stakeholders respond to the gold card visa proposal.

Conclusion: Change, Continuity, or Coexistence?

President Donald Trump’s gold card visa represents a bold vision for reshaping U.S. immigration strategies surrounding wealth and investment. With a much higher investment threshold and new corporate sponsorship perks, it marks a fundamental departure from the goals and mechanisms underpinning the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. Whether this proposal will replace the EB-5 or emerge as a complementary option remains unclear.

For now, the EB-5 visa continues to serve as the leading channel for foreign investors who aim to contribute to the U.S. economy while securing residency. However, both potential and current applicants should stay informed on forthcoming legislative updates. As the landscape evolves, timely and accurate information will be crucial—not only for ensuring compliance but also for seizing opportunities across the shifting terrain of American immigration. For more details on related programs, individuals can reference the official USCIS EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program page.

Learn Today

Gold Card Visa → A proposed U.S. visa program requiring a $5 million investment, aimed at wealthy foreign individuals for residency.
EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program → A U.S. visa program offering residency via economic investments, requiring job creation and minimum financial thresholds.
Targeted Employment Area (TEA) → Specific U.S. geographic regions (rural or high-unemployment areas) incentivized with reduced investment requirements under EB-5.
Regional Centers → Entities approved to pool EB-5 investor funds for large-scale projects, facilitating economic development and job creation.
Corporate Sponsorships → A proposed gold card visa feature allowing companies to secure U.S. residency for valuable skilled or educated employees.

This Article in a Nutshell

Trump’s proposed gold card visa targets ultra-wealthy investors, requiring $5 million—far surpassing the EB-5 program’s $900,000 minimum. Without job creation mandates, it risks excluding middle-class entrepreneurs while prioritizing elite migration. By reshaping economic immigration, this bold initiative sparks global interest but raises questions: evolution or exclusivity? Congress holds the ultimate verdict.
— By VisaVerge.com