UCLA Student Liu Lijun Loses Visa After Pro-Palestine Protests

Key Takeaways

• On February 1, 2025, Liu Lijun’s student visa was revoked under a new executive order targeting pro-Palestinian activism.
• The January 31, 2025 executive order allows visa revocation for international students involved in protests deemed antisemitic or politically sensitive.
• Civil rights groups and the ACLU filed a lawsuit on March 5, 2025, challenging the executive order as unconstitutional.

On February 1, 2025, Liu Lijun, a Chinese 🇨🇳 graduate student at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), had her student visa revoked after she helped organize pro-Palestine rallies on campus. This decision, linked to a new executive order signed by President Donald Trump, has sparked debates about international students’ rights, the boundaries of political activism, and the U.S. immigration system.

The Executive Order and Its Connection to Liu Lijun’s Case

President Trump’s executive order, signed on January 31, 2025, was introduced to address antisemitism on college campuses. A key feature of this order allows federal agencies to monitor and penalize international students who participate in or organize pro-Palestinian activism. Under this directive, international students could face visa revocations and even deportation if deemed involved in initiatives that the administration interprets as crossing certain boundaries.

Liu Lijun reportedly became a target due to her role in campus protests tied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Specifically, Liu was among those arrested during a significant demonstration in May 2024 at UCLA. This protest, attended by hundreds, was linked to the aftermath of escalating violence between Israel and Hamas, which began on October 7, 2023. Police intervention at the demonstration led to clashes, and over 100 people sustained injuries, with several requiring medical attention. Liu’s arrest placed her under scrutiny, culminating in the revocation of her student visa.

Mixed Reactions and Larger Concerns

Legal and civil rights advocates have raised serious concerns about the implications of this new policy. While U.S. citizens’ First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceful assembly are constitutionally protected, international students on visas face a different reality. Their ability to stay in the U.S. is conditional, and immigration laws provide significant latitude for the federal government to enforce actions against them.

Civil rights groups have been outspoken about the executive order. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) criticized the directive, calling it an attack on free speech that unfairly targets international students. Similarly, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has taken legal action, arguing that this new rule violates the First Amendment and undermines broader legal principles. They filed a lawsuit on March 5, 2025, to challenge the order, hoping to stop its enforcement.

Immediate Impacts of Student Visa Revocation

Liu Lijun’s situation does not only concern her individual case—it represents a broader worry for international students in the U.S., especially for those active in political movements. The fear of losing one’s student visa has cast a shadow over campuses, with international student communities feeling heightened pressure. The vague language of the executive order makes some students fear that mere involvement in peaceful protests could lead to severe immigration repercussions, regardless of their intentions or actions.

Universities, caught in the middle, now face tougher challenges. UCLA has not directly addressed the specifics of Liu’s case, citing privacy rules. However, the university’s general statement emphasized its commitment to safeguarding both student rights and campus safety. Across the country, educational institutions are urgently reassessing their policies to support international students navigating this evolving landscape. While some colleges are tightening protest guidelines, many are also directing resources toward legal counseling for their international students.

Diplomatic and Legislative Responses

Liu’s visa revocation and its circumstances have now become part of a larger, more global conversation. On February 15, 2025, the Chinese 🇨🇳 Ministry of Foreign Affairs called out the treatment of its students in the U.S., asking American authorities to ensure “fair and just” processes in such cases. As Chinese students form a significant proportion of international students in the U.S., this has introduced potential tensions into U.S.-China 🇺🇸🇨🇳 relations, focusing specifically on academic exchange programs.

Congress has also responded to the growing outcry. A group of senators introduced new legislation, titled the “International Student Freedom of Expression Act,” on March 1, 2025. If passed, this bill aims to restrict government powers like those in the executive order and provide clearer protections for international students engaged in lawful political activities. These developments show that Liu Lijun’s case has resonated far beyond UCLA, possibly shaping policies for years to come.

Complexities of Campus Activism and Immigration

Liu’s case has not only reignited concerns about the boundaries of student activism but also led universities to reconsider how they define and regulate demonstrations. Some institutions have implemented stricter protocols, including requiring students to obtain permits before protesting or limiting where demonstrations can take place. At the same time, a task force formed by the Department of Education is now studying how political activism, campus safety, and academic freedom intersect. Expected to release recommendations by the end of 2025, this body will likely influence future policies nationwide.

For international students, the situation is even more precarious. Many now wonder whether political expression, even in its lawful forms, jeopardizes their immigration status. This uncertainty complicates how they experience academic life in the U.S., potentially discouraging them from participating fully in civic discussions on campus.

A Broader Look at Free Speech and Immigration

The revocation of Liu Lijun’s student visa has amplified the ongoing debate over the limits of political expression within the U.S. immigration framework. International students, often seen as ambassadors of cultural exchange, now bear the weight of staying silent for fear of jeopardizing their futures. Critics argue that such policies send a chilling message, directly contradicting the free and open exchange of ideas central to academic institutions.

Civil rights organizations are rallying to protect these freedoms and access to legal recourse. Lawsuits like the one filed by the ACLU represent a broader pushback against what is seen as an erosion of individual liberties for specific groups of people, especially those who lack citizenship.

Implications for U.S.-China Relations and Academic Collaboration

The international scope of Liu’s case has grown beyond U.S. borders. With Chinese officials reacting swiftly, there are signs that such cases might strain diplomatic relationships. Cultural and academic exchange programs were already facing challenges amid broader U.S.-China tensions. Liu’s case, and similar situations that may follow, could further complicate student diplomacy efforts, which historically serve as bridges between nations.

For universities, losing international students due to restrictive immigration policies can have lasting consequences. Not only do these institutions lose diversity in thought and culture, but they also risk their reputation as global educators. If policies like the executive order persist without clear modifications, educational institutions in the U.S. could see fewer international students choosing to apply.

Looking Ahead

Liu Lijun’s case is still unfolding, with several unknowns remaining. What happens to Liu following her visa revocation remains unclear—details of any deportation proceedings have not been made public, adding uncertainty to what lies ahead for her. For now, her case continues to be a symbol of how immigration laws, national security, and civil liberties intersect to create complex and often controversial outcomes.

There is also much at stake for policymakers, universities, and activists. Proposed legislative measures, including the International Student Freedom of Expression Act, seek to ease tensions by clarifying protections for non-citizens. Such legislation, along with upcoming legal challenges, could influence broader policies that determine the rights and responsibilities of international students across the U.S.

Final Thoughts

The revocation of Liu Lijun’s visa draws attention to critical debates about free speech and U.S. immigration laws. As this story unfolds, the larger question remains: How can the U.S. balance national security concerns while maintaining its long-standing tradition of academic freedom and open expression? The outcome of Liu’s case, coupled with the ripple effects of the related executive order, will undoubtedly shape the future of international education, campus activism, and immigration policies for years to come.

If you are an international student navigating the U.S. immigration system, it is crucial to stay informed about policy changes. For reliable, up-to-date information and support, consult official resources like U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. For further insights into global immigration trends, VisaVerge.com also offers invaluable perspectives on the evolving landscape of education and immigration.

Learn Today

Executive Order → A directive issued by the U.S. President that manages operations of the federal government and has the force of law.
Visa Revocation → The act of canceling a visa, removing the individual’s authorization to enter or stay in a country.
First Amendment → A part of the U.S. Constitution protecting freedoms like speech, religion, press, assembly, and petitioning the government.
Deportation → The formal removal of a foreign national from a country due to violations of immigration laws or other legal offenses.
Academic Freedom → The principle that scholars and students can engage in intellectual discussion and expression without external restrictions or penalties.

This Article in a Nutshell

Liu Lijun’s visa revocation spotlights tensions between political activism and U.S. immigration policy. President Trump’s 2025 executive order penalizes international students involved in pro-Palestinian protests, sparking global debate. Critics challenge its impact on free speech and academic exchange. Liu’s case symbolizes growing uncertainties for students navigating activism under restrictive immigration rules.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Hispanic Churches Struggle as Immigration Crackdown Sparks Fear, Uncertainty
• Charges Dropped Against B.C. Woman in Immigration Fraud Case
• U.S. Deportation: First Large Flight of Chinese Migrants Since 2018
• China Targets French Students for Study Programs
• China Extends Visa Free Entry for European Nations and Malaysia