USCIS Broadens Use of Notices to Appear

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

On February 28, 2025, USCIS expanded NTA issuance authority, prioritizing removal for individuals denied immigration benefits and out of lawful status.
USCIS will now issue NTAs in cases involving fraud, misrepresentation, or inadmissibility during naturalization, increasing scrutiny across visa categories.
Employment-based applicants in dual roles (e.g., H-1B owner-beneficiaries) and dependents may face NTAs, adding risks for specific visa holders.

On February 28, 2025, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) put into effect a 2025 policy memorandum that significantly broadens its authority to issue Notices to Appear (NTAs). NTAs are formal documents that begin the process of removal or deportation for individuals suspected of not complying with U.S. immigration laws. This policy shift demonstrates a move toward stricter enforcement measures, with the goal of reinforcing immigration compliance and ensuring the system’s integrity. The policy has wide-reaching consequences for individuals applying for immigration benefits and others involved in the process.

The changes outlined in the memorandum introduce several important updates regarding the circumstances in which USCIS can issue NTAs. For years, this role predominantly belonged to agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Let’s examine how these changes will reshape the immigration landscape, why the adjustments were introduced, and their likely impact on different groups.

Key Changes Under the 2025 Policy Memorandum

The 2025 policy memorandum marks a clear departure from USCIS’s previous guidelines. Below are the main updates:

Issuance of NTAs Following Denial of Immigration Benefits
If an individual’s petition for an immigration benefit is denied and they are no longer in lawful immigration status, USCIS is now mandated to issue an NTA. This applies to cases where a person’s status lapsed while waiting for a decision on their application. Such individuals are now prioritized for removal proceedings.
Action Against Fraud and Misrepresentation
USCIS will issue NTAs in cases where fraud or material misrepresentation is proven, regardless of the reasons for the denial of the benefit. This provision primarily focuses on discouraging fraudulent filings and protecting the credibility of the U.S. immigration system.
Employment-Based Categories Affected
Although most people using employment-based visa categories are still exempt from NTA issuance, certain groups will no longer enjoy this exemption. Individuals who are both employers and beneficiaries—such as some E-1/E-2 treaty investors, H-1B owner-beneficiaries, and O-1 extraordinary ability visa applicants—could face NTAs if they fall out of status. Moreover, family members dependent on these visas will no longer be shielded under these exemptions.
Naturalization Applicants Facing Closer Scrutiny
Applicants for U.S. citizenship through naturalization may be issued an NTA if USCIS discovers that they were inadmissible when they first received lawful permanent resident (green card) status. This includes cases where individuals provided false information or had unresolved inadmissibility concerns.

These changes significantly expand the situations in which individuals could find themselves subjected to removal proceedings and underscore the importance of maintaining lawful immigration status at all times.

Immediate Consequences of the Revised Policy

The changes under the 2025 memorandum will have immediate and far-reaching effects on noncitizens and others connected to the immigration process. Below, we explore the most notable consequences:

Increased Number of NTAs
With the expanded authority, USCIS is expected to issue NTAs in a much larger range of situations. As a result, the number of people referred for removal proceedings could increase significantly. Between benefit denials and stricter fraud measures, the policy is structured to capture individuals who might otherwise have remained unnoticed by enforcement authorities.
Reduced Officer Discretion
The expanded policies limit the ability of USCIS officers to make discretionary decisions about whether to issue an NTA. Officers must thoroughly document all decisions not to issue NTAs, and this is allowed only in rare and compelling circumstances. This approach creates a framework where enforcement is more consistent and reflective of the new priorities.
Tighter Documentation Protocols
To prevent inconsistencies, USCIS requires detailed records to be kept whenever officers decide to use their limited discretion. This documentation will be tracked across the USCIS system, ensuring accountability and adherence to the memorandum’s directives.

Compliance with these policies demands that immigrants pay closer attention to legal requirements and seek qualified guidance to avoid missteps that could result in NTAs.

Historical Context of NTA Issuance by USCIS

This expansion in USCIS authority reflects a significant change over time. Historically, the responsibility for issuing NTAs rested mostly with ICE and CBP, with USCIS playing a secondary role. To understand the current shift, it’s worth briefly revisiting the evolution of USCIS’s involvement in enforcement.

Pre-2011 Guidelines
Before 2011, USCIS’s authority to issue NTAs was limited. NTAs were typically reserved for cases involving criminal activity, national security threats, and clear instances of immigration fraud.
2018 Policy Changes During the Trump Administration
In 2018, USCIS expanded its use of NTAs under the administration’s stricter immigration policy framework. NTAs were issued more widely, including in cases of benefit denial for applicants who became out of status during the process. However, these rules were inconsistently applied for employment-based categories due to legal challenges and operational delays.
Policy Shift in 2021 Under President Biden
The Biden administration initially rolled back USCIS’s broader NTA authority in an effort to prioritize resources and reduce the strain on immigration courts. By using stricter prosecutorial discretion, the policy avoided placing as many applicants into removal proceedings.

The 2025 policy memorandum reestablishes and even extends the broader authority first proposed in 2018. By doing so, the administration aims to solidify USCIS’s role in directly handling immigration enforcement.

Why This Policy Shift Now?

Several motivations have contributed to the administration’s decision to expand USCIS’s involvement in removal proceedings:

Enforcing Compliance with Immigration Laws
The broader authority ensures that individuals who fall out of status or engage in fraud are held accountable more promptly. This addresses concerns that such cases can undermine the overall immigration system.
Fighting Immigration Fraud
Cases of fraud and misrepresentation can devalue the legitimacy of immigration benefits. By expanding its enforcement tools, USCIS sends a strong message of zero tolerance for fraudulent activity.
Public Safety Goals
The policy also facilitates the removal of noncitizens with criminal records or those who are deemed to pose a public safety risk.

Together, these objectives are meant to create a more structured enforcement system while prioritizing the integrity of U.S. immigration policies.

Broader Effects of the 2025 Policy Shift

This expanded authority for USCIS will impact many groups and processes, including:

Employment-Based Visa Holders
While most employment-based applicants are exempt, those in dual roles as petitioners and beneficiaries—for instance, H-1B employer-owners—could face higher risks of NTA issuance. This adds additional uncertainty for entrepreneurs and business owners seeking to bring economic activity to the U.S.
Delayed Immigration Proceedings
As more NTAs are issued, the increased volume could create added strain on an immigration court system that is already stretched thin. This may lead to longer wait times for cases to reach resolution.
Stronger Deterrence of Unlawful Immigration
By enforcing removal proceedings against individuals out of status, USCIS aims to reduce the number of noncitizens residing in the U.S. without authorization.

Preparing for the Stricter Landscape

The USCIS expansion of NTA issuance authority sets clear expectations for immigrants and stakeholders. Proper preparation is essential for minimizing risks under the new framework. For noncitizens, this may include:

Maintaining lawful status and avoiding gaps during benefit petitions.
Being transparent and truthful in all filings to avoid exposure to fraud or misrepresentation allegations.
Seeking legal advice from qualified professionals before filing immigration petitions or during the appeal of unfavorable decisions.

The USCIS website offers a wealth of resources, including up-to-date policy announcements. For complete details about NTAs and related procedures, visit the official USCIS page on NTAs.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, these policy shifts signal a stricter stance that makes compliance more challenging yet vital. The expanded memorandum not only changes USCIS’s operations but also emphasizes the importance of thoughtful, well-informed immigration filing strategies in 2025 and beyond.

Learn Today

Notice to Appear (NTA) → A formal document initiating removal or deportation proceedings for individuals suspected of violating U.S. immigration laws.
Lawful Immigration Status → A condition where a noncitizen complies with U.S. visa or immigration rules, allowing them to remain legally in the country.
Material Misrepresentation → Providing false or misleading information significant enough to influence the decision on an immigration application or status.
Removal Proceedings → Legal processes to determine whether a noncitizen should be deported from the United States for law violations.
Prosecutorial Discretion → Authority to decide the scope of enforcement actions, such as when and against whom to issue NTAs.

This Article in a Nutshell

USCIS’s 2025 policy expands its authority to issue Notices to Appear, targeting immigration benefit denials, fraud, and noncompliance. This marks a stricter enforcement era, urging immigrants to maintain lawful status and transparency. With increased NTAs and limited discretion, seeking expert guidance is crucial to navigating this evolving, more challenging immigration landscape effectively.
— By VisaVerge.com

• New Policy Clarifies Use of Notices to Appear for Deportation Cases
• Decoding 221(g) Notices: What Each Color Means for Your Visa!
• Understanding H-1B Visa Approval Notices: I-797, I-797A, I-797B, I-797C
• Understanding the Difference: NOID vs. NOIR – What are Immigration Notices?
• Tennessee House Backs Bill Giving Undocumented Immigrants 72 Hours to Leave