H1B Cost calulator online VisaVerge toolH1B Cost calulator online VisaVerge tool

Trump’s New Gold Card Visa Plan Faces Pushback from Billionaires

On February 25, 2025, Donald Trump introduced the "Gold Card" visa program to attract wealthy immigrants. Aimed at boosting the U.S. economy, the initiative offers exclusive privileges to affluent individuals. However, it has sparked criticism, particularly from billionaires, who view it as elitist and unnecessary. The program has triggered debates over immigration fairness and economic priorities.

Shashank Singh
By Shashank Singh - Breaking News Reporter
12 Min Read

Key Takeaways

  • The “Gold Card” visa program, announced February 25, 2025, requires a $5 million investment and offers immediate U.S. residency and citizenship.
  • Unlike the EB-5 visa, the Gold Card demands no job creation, has global eligibility, and faces criticism for its high cost.
  • Congressional approval and policy adjustments, like lowering the investment threshold, are needed to address lukewarm interest and ethical concerns.

On February 25, 2025, President Donald Trump introduced a new immigration initiative called the “Gold Card” visa program. This program aims to attract wealthy foreign investors by offering them a path to U.S. citizenship in exchange for a significant financial investment of $5 million. The initiative, seen as a replacement for the existing EB-5 immigrant investor visa program, marks a bold shift in U.S. immigration policy. Despite the efforts to promote it as a premium, fast-track option for legal residency and eventual citizenship, early reactions from billionaires have revealed significant skepticism.

The Trump administration has framed the Gold Card program as an opportunity to draw significant foreign investment into the U.S. economy. In the Oval Office press conference announcing the program, President Trump described it as a “premium version of a Green Card” tailored for wealthy investors. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, emphasizing its exclusivity, referred to it as the “Trump Gold Card.” However, despite the administration’s high expectations, the reception from its intended audience—ultra-wealthy individuals—has been disappointing.

Trump
Trump’s New Gold Card Visa Plan Faces Pushback from Billionaires

Key Features of the Gold Card Program

The Gold Card program offers several distinct features compared to the EB-5 visa, which it seeks to replace. These include:

  1. Investment Threshold: Applicants must invest $5 million, a significant increase from the EB-5 program’s investment range of $800,000 to $1.05 million.
  2. Immediate Residency: Successful applicants would immediately receive legal residency upon approval and gain a clear pathway to citizenship.
  3. No Job Creation Requirement: Unlike the EB-5 program, which requires the creation or maintenance of at least 10 full-time jobs, the Gold Card does not impose such obligations on its applicants.
  4. Global Eligibility: The program opens the door to applicants from a wide range of countries, including controversial groups like Russian oligarchs.

The Trump administration has set ambitious revenue goals for the program. By projecting the sale of up to 10 million Gold Cards, President Trump suggested the scheme could generate an unprecedented $50 trillion. He argued that this influx of wealth would not only stimulate the U.S. economy but also help reduce the nation’s federal deficit.

Why Billionaires Are Not Enthusiastic

Despite the administration’s confidence, Forbes magazine revealed a tepid reaction from billionaires in a survey of 18 wealthy individuals. Only two expressed any real interest in participating in the program. Several factors contribute to this lack of enthusiasm.

1. Existing Investment Options

Many wealthy investors see little need for the Gold Card program. As one Canadian billionaire explained to Forbes, there are already easier and more affordable ways to invest in the United States without going through such a program. “If you’re a billionaire, you don’t need it. I don’t have to come to the United States to invest in the United States,” he said.

2. Unnecessary Benefits

For ultra-high-net-worth individuals, U.S. residency or citizenship may not add much value. A European billionaire remarked, “In my opinion, there is no reason for rich people to go to this program.” Many wealthy individuals can access the U.S. and its economy without formal residency or citizenship.

3. Attachment to Current Citizenship

The desire to maintain loyalty to their existing country is another factor. For example, Indian billionaire Abhay Soi, head of Max Healthcare, told Forbes, “I wouldn’t want to be a citizen of any country other than India anytime—particularly in this century.”

4. High Cost Without Clear Value

The program’s hefty $5 million price tag has left many potential applicants unimpressed. A Russian billionaire expressed confusion over who would willingly pay such a substantial amount. “Whoever has a business idea can do it now for very cheap, so why spend $5 million? I do not understand who will pay $5 million,” he noted.

5. Political Concerns

The association with President Donald Trump and his administration is a turn-off for some. Given the divisive nature of Trump’s presidency, many potential applicants may feel uneasy about aligning themselves with the initiative.

Implications for U.S. Immigration Policy

The Gold Card program has sparked a larger debate about what this new scheme means for U.S. immigration. Analysts argue that by transforming U.S. residency into a commodity that can be purchased, this initiative departs from traditional principles that value family ties, skills, and humanitarian needs in the immigration process. Critics worry this could set a concerning precedent, where financial wealth becomes the defining qualification for immigration.

Moreover, with a $5 million investment requirement, the Gold Card would rank among the world’s most expensive residency-by-investment schemes. This high threshold could deter applicants and limit the program’s effectiveness. The EB-5 program, even with its lower financial requirements and job creation conditions, has faced significant challenges in attracting investors. The Gold Card’s approach may amplify these obstacles rather than overcome them.

For the Trump administration to move forward with implementing the Gold Card, it must first win congressional approval. Immigration remains a highly contentious topic in U.S. politics, and convincing lawmakers to support such a drastic change in policy will not be easy. Critics on both sides of the political aisle may find fault with the program—some viewing it as a commodification of citizenship, while others see it as inadequate in promoting broader economic benefits.

Additionally, the program’s openness to applicants like Russian oligarchs has drawn criticism. President Trump’s remark during the press conference—”I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people”—has raised eyebrows, particularly in light of existing U.S. sanctions against many wealthy Russians. This aspect of the program could invite scrutiny regarding its national security and geopolitical implications.

Ethical Questions About “Golden Visa” Programs

The ethical debate surrounding the commodification of residency or citizenship through programs like the Gold Card is not unique to the U.S. According to Henley & Partners, a firm specializing in investment migration, over 100 countries offer similar schemes. These programs raise questions about fairness, national security risks, and the social implications of equating citizenship with purchasing power.

Critics argue that such programs can result in inequality, undermining the significance of citizenship as a bond between individuals and their adopted country. They also warn of potential security risks, including money laundering and other illicit activities.

Refining the Program for Success

To make the Gold Card more attractive to potential applicants, the administration might need to introduce changes, such as:

  • Lower Investment Requirements: Reducing the $5 million threshold could make the program more competitive with other countries’ investor visas.
  • Flexible Investment Options: Allowing applicants to fund businesses in diverse sectors could broaden the program’s appeal.
  • Job Creation Targets: Including employment-related goals might align the program’s objectives with existing economic priorities.
  • Additional Benefits: Offering exclusive perks to Gold Card holders could make the investment seem more worthwhile.

Conclusion: A Questionable Start for the Trump Gold Card

The Gold Card visa scheme, while ambitious, has had a shaky introduction. With wealthy individuals expressing limited interest so far, the administration faces significant challenges in meeting its lofty goals. Unless major adjustments are made to address the concerns of its target audience, the program may struggle to achieve the economic benefits it seeks. Moreover, the ethical, legal, and political debates surrounding the program add further complexity to its path forward.

As the launch date approaches, the Trump administration will need to act quickly to resolve issues, refine its pitch, and provide greater clarity. The ultimate success of the Gold Card program could have a lasting influence not only on U.S. immigration policy but also on the global perception of America as a destination for investment and innovation. For those interested in learning more about U.S. immigration programs, the official U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) website is an excellent resource.

Learn Today

Gold Card Visa Program → A proposed U.S. initiative offering citizenship to wealthy investors who commit a $5 million financial investment.
EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa → An existing U.S. visa program granting residency to foreign investors who meet job creation and financial investment requirements.
Residency-by-Investment Scheme → A program allowing individuals to obtain legal residency in a country by making a substantial financial investment.
Commodification of Citizenship → The process of monetizing citizenship, treating it as a product that can be purchased rather than earned traditionally.
Russian Oligarchs → Wealthy and influential Russian businesspeople, often closely associated with politics and sometimes facing international sanctions.

This Article in a Nutshell

President Trump’s Gold Card visa program promises U.S. citizenship for a $5 million investment but faces skepticism from billionaires. Lacking job creation requirements, it’s criticized as overpriced and unnecessary. Critics warn it commodifies citizenship, challenging traditional immigration values. Without adjustments, this bold initiative risks failing to attract its wealthy target audience.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

Wealth Advisers Question Trump’s $5M ‘Gold Card’ Visa Plan
“Trump Bets Big on $5M ‘Gold Card’ Visas: Will They Really ‘Sell Like Crazy’?”
Wealthy investors offered a fast track to U.S. residency with a $5M price tag—but is it a game-changer or a gamble?

Portugal Golden Visa Changes in 2025: Key Fund Choices for Investors
Trump Suggests $5M “Gold Card” Visas to Cut $36 Trillion U.S. Debt
Trump’s ‘Gold Card’ Proposal Sparks Renewed Focus on Global Golden Visas

Share This Article
Shashank Singh
Breaking News Reporter
Follow:
As a Breaking News Reporter at VisaVerge.com, Shashank Singh is dedicated to delivering timely and accurate news on the latest developments in immigration and travel. His quick response to emerging stories and ability to present complex information in an understandable format makes him a valuable asset. Shashank's reporting keeps VisaVerge's readers at the forefront of the most current and impactful news in the field.
Leave a Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments