Tom Homan Criticizes Slow Pace of Immigration Arrests Under New Plan

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

Tom Homan urges increased arrests of hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants, citing sanctuary cities, leaks, and resource shortages as obstacles.
ICE reportedly executes 900 daily arrests, tripling President Biden’s term figures, though detailed statistics remain undisclosed, raising concerns.
New measures include arrests in sensitive locations, military deportation aircraft usage, and interagency collaboration with IRS agents against trafficking.

Tom Homan, serving as the border czar for President Trump’s administration, has openly expressed his dissatisfaction with the current pace of immigration arrests. A key figure in the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts, Homan has highlighted several obstacles that have slowed the implementation of the administration’s ambitious mass deportation plan. Speaking at the White House on February 12, 2025, Homan remarked, “There’s more criminal aliens that need to be arrested—hundreds of thousands. Sanctuary cities are putting roadblocks up. We’ve got leaks. So we need to increase the arrests of illegal aliens.”

According to the administration, its immigration enforcement team is reportedly handling around 900 arrests daily. This represents a claimed increase of threefold compared to the final year of President Biden’s term. However, these figures remain difficult to verify since Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has declined to publicly release detailed arrest statistics. The lack of transparency has raised concerns, leaving the actual impact and efficiency of the current immigration strategies open to debate.

Tom Homan Criticizes Slow Pace of Immigration Arrests Under New Plan

Key Obstacles in Carrying Out Mass Deportations

Despite aggressive immigration policies, several factors have hindered the administration’s ability to achieve its deportation objectives:

Sanctuary Cities: Tom Homan has pointed to what he describes as “roadblocks” created by sanctuary cities. These are areas where local governments have chosen to limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. This lack of collaboration makes it harder for ICE to detain undocumented immigrants. Sanctuary cities typically argue that their policies build trust between local law enforcement and immigrant communities, but the federal government views them as direct opposition to immigration enforcement.
Information Leaks: Another challenge has been operational leaks. Homan recently detailed a specific instance in Colorado where plans to arrest approximately 100 individuals suspected of being part of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua were undermined due to leaked intelligence. As a result, only 30 arrests were made during the operation. Leak investigations are ongoing, with Homan alleging that the FBI may be involved in unauthorized disclosures.
Limited Resources: The border czar has also acknowledged that resource shortages are another major hurdle. With limited funding from Congress, ICE is unable to detain and process as many individuals as the administration’s plans demand. “We can do what we can with the money we have,” Homan explained, while stressing that more funding would substantially increase the scope of their efforts.
Legal Challenges: Court battles also pose significant barriers. Efforts to alter longstanding immigration policies, such as birthright citizenship, have faced legal pushback. Federal judges have temporarily blocked several measures, adding further delays to the administration’s agenda.

Actions Taken to Boost Enforcement

In response to these challenges, the administration has taken a series of bold steps to step up immigration enforcement:

Revised Policies on Sensitive Locations: Acting Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman issued new guidelines on February 12, 2025, allowing ICE to conduct arrests in “sensitive” areas. Historically, locations like schools, hospitals, and churches were considered off-limits to enforcement actions. Now, those protections have been removed in an effort to broaden ICE’s operational reach.
Deployment of Military Aircraft: Breaking historic precedents, the U.S. military has become directly involved in immigration enforcement. The recent use of military aircraft to deport undocumented immigrants marks a notable escalation. This step, taken in the week leading up to February 16, 2025, has drawn widespread attention.
Recruiting Federal Resources: Homeland Security has advocated for interagency collaboration. Notably, the U.S. Treasury Department has been asked to temporarily assign IRS agents, particularly those specializing in tax crimes, to help combat human trafficking networks. These agents have also been tasked with identifying businesses that employ undocumented workers.
Investigations into Leaks: Efforts are underway to uncover the sources of leaked enforcement information. The administration has claimed progress in identifying the individuals responsible, with Homan suggesting that the Colorado leak likely originated within law enforcement ranks, possibly even the FBI.

Controversy Surrounding Aggressive Immigration Policies

The administration’s aggressive immigration measures have sparked a broad spectrum of reactions. While some support stepped-up enforcement, others raise questions about its social and practical ramifications:

Non-Criminal Targets: Although President Trump’s administration originally emphasized targeting undocumented individuals with criminal records, evidence suggests otherwise. According to an investigation by ProPublica, less than half of those arrested by February 2025 had any criminal history. This disparity has fueled criticism that the policy has deviated from its stated purpose.
Impact on Communities: Expanding enforcement to sensitive locations such as schools and churches has drawn criticism from immigrant advocacy groups and religious leaders. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration voiced concern, emphasizing that such policies are likely to create fear, not safety, in vulnerable communities.
Transparency Issues: The administration’s decision to cease the publication of arrest and deportation statistics has faced scrutiny. Without concrete numbers, critics argue it’s harder to assess the true success or failure of enforcement efforts. The lack of information has contributed to skepticism about whether the administration’s claimed arrest totals accurately reflect reality.
Overreach Allegations: The growing involvement of federal agencies, military resources, and deployment in sensitive locations has alarmed civil rights advocates. Many fear that this expansion could erode trust in these agencies and create a more polarized atmosphere around immigration issues.

What Lies Ahead

The next phase of President Trump’s immigration plan will likely depend on several factors, including resource allocation, legal rulings, and public opinion:

Congressional Funding: Securing additional funding for ICE remains crucial. Homan has stressed that their ability to increase arrest totals hinges directly on budgetary support from Congress.
Overcoming Legal Challenges: The administration must navigate an environment filled with legal hurdles as courts continue to weigh the constitutionality of proposed changes.
Improved Interagency Coordination: Collaboration among government agencies, such as ICE, the IRS, and Homeland Security, is expected to play a central role in identifying undocumented individuals and curbing human trafficking networks.
Public Reception: Sustained criticism from sanctuary cities, faith-based organizations, and civil rights groups will likely test the administration’s immigration policies. How these dynamics shape public opinion may influence future political or legislative adjustments.

Tom Homan’s dissatisfaction with the pace of immigration arrests underlines the complexities of enforcing immigration policy on a national scale. While the Trump administration has intensified efforts through broader enforcement directives and interagency cooperation, these measures are not without their share of resistance and controversy. Sanctuary cities, legal roadblocks, and ongoing resource limitations pose significant challenges as the administration seeks to establish stricter immigration control.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, the administration’s latest actions reflect a deliberate push to overcome these challenges. Its approach, however, has raised questions about the equitable application of enforcement measures, the targeting of non-criminals, and the broader impact on immigrant communities. For those interested in the specifics of current immigration policies and enforcement processes, the official Immigration and Customs Enforcement website offers comprehensive information here.

Moving forward, debates surrounding immigration enforcement are set to intensify, with stakeholders on all sides closely watching how these efforts unfold—and what consequences they might bring for undocumented immigrants, local communities, and the nation as a whole.

Learn Today

Sanctuary Cities → Areas limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, aiming to protect undocumented immigrants and build trust among communities.
Sensitive Locations → Historically designated areas like schools, hospitals, or churches where immigration enforcement actions were previously restricted.
Mass Deportation → Large-scale removal of undocumented individuals from a country, often requiring significant logistical and enforcement resources.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) → U.S. federal agency responsible for enforcing laws related to immigration, human trafficking, and customs violations.
Interagency Collaboration → Coordination between multiple government agencies to address complex issues, such as immigration enforcement or anti-human trafficking efforts.

This Article in a Nutshell

Tom Homan, Trump’s border czar, demands faster immigration arrests, citing sanctuary city resistance, operational leaks, and funding shortages. With daily arrests tripling since Biden’s term, transparency issues fuel criticism. Striking a balance between enforcement and community trust remains contentious. As legal battles intensify, immigration policy evolves, shaping America’s future and sparking nationwide debate.
— By VisaVerge.com