North Korea Criticizes Trump’s Plan to Take Over Gaza Strip

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

North Korea condemned Trump’s Gaza plan on February 12, 2025, calling it a violation of sovereignty and international law.
The proposal involves U.S. control of Gaza and Palestinian resettlement, sparking global criticism and concerns over regional destabilization.
North Korea criticized U.S. “hegemonic” policies, linking them to historical actions and a shifting global balance of power against U.S. dominance.

North Korea 🇰🇵 has sharply criticized U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent proposal to take control of the Gaza Strip and resettle its Palestinian population. In a commentary issued by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on February 12, 2025, the proposal was called a blatant violation of national sovereignty and international law. Although the statement did not refer to Trump by name, its critical tone left little doubt about its target.

“The world is now boiling like a porridge pot over the U.S.’ bombshell announcement,” the KCNA said, using vivid language to emphasize global outrage over the controversial plan. The proposal, first mentioned by President Trump in a joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this month, has caused widespread criticism. According to the announcement, the United States would “take over” the Gaza Strip and resettle Palestinians elsewhere. This idea has raised serious concerns among various countries and international groups.

North Korea Criticizes Trump’s Plan to Take Over Gaza Strip

North Korea’s condemnation of the plan went beyond disagreement. The KCNA described it as an example of what it called the U.S.’ “nature to survive through slaughter and robbery.” It accused the United States of pursuing “hegemonic, invasive” policies aimed at global dominance. According to North Korea, this issue is bigger than the Gaza Strip itself, pointing to broader concerns about sovereignty and shifting international relations.

The KCNA further accused the U.S. administration of ignoring international law. The commentary referenced several controversial proposals made by President Trump to strengthen this claim, including his previous proposal to purchase Greenland, his call to reclaim the Panama Canal, and a decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. These examples, according to North Korea, reflect a troubling trend of disregard for the sovereignty and dignity of other nations.

Adding weight to its argument, North Korea claimed the global balance of power is changing. “The unipolar era, in which the U.S. stood as the sole superpower, has already passed,” the KCNA said. This statement suggests North Korea sees the world moving away from U.S.-centered dominance as competition among global powers grows. It also highlights North Korea’s attempts to frame itself as a strong opponent of U.S. policies.

The KCNA concluded its commentary with a direct warning to the United States. It called on Washington to “wake up from its anachronistic delusion and immediately stop violating other countries’ dignity and sovereignty.” This statement reflects North Korea’s view that Trump’s proposal is rooted in outdated thinking, which it claims fuels conflict and disregards the rights of others.

North Korea was especially critical of Trump’s remarks about resettling Palestinians. Its state media called these ideas “tyrannical” and argued that they crushed “the thin hopes of the Palestinians who wish for peace and a stable life in the region.” This sharp language positions North Korea as a defender of Palestinian rights, using their plight to further criticize U.S. foreign policy.

The timing of North Korea’s condemnation is notable. It came just days after Trump’s announcement and during ongoing unrest in the Middle East. Responding so quickly allows North Korea to present itself as aligned with nations that oppose the United States. This tactic also gives North Korea a platform to influence global discussions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

However, North Korea’s long-standing history of criticizing the U.S. is about more than the Gaza issue. The KCNA commentary spoke about the broader patterns of U.S. foreign policy. It accused Washington of repeated violations of international norms and claimed that the U.S. disregards the sovereignty of other nations. This fits into a well-worn narrative used by North Korea, which often positions itself as a vocal critic of what it sees as American imperialism.

In weighing in on the Gaza plan, North Korea also appears to be inserting itself into a complex geopolitical situation. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been a focal point of international tensions. By condemning Trump’s proposal, North Korea may be trying to strengthen ties with other nations that support Palestinian interests. Publicly siding with the Palestinians could also boost Pyongyang’s image as a part of the global struggle against U.S. influence.

The controversy surrounding Trump’s Gaza idea raises broader questions about international responses to U.S. foreign policy. While North Korea’s reaction is dramatic, other nations and organizations have also voiced their concerns. Critics argue that the plan complicates an already tense situation in the Gaza Strip. For years, this area has suffered from conflict, poverty, and political deadlock, making any sweeping proposal highly controversial.

Moreover, critics say that resettling Palestinians would not address the root causes of the tension between Israel and Palestine. Many argue it would instead deepen the sense of betrayal among Palestinians and their allies. The proposal also risks destabilizing the region further by increasing mistrust between the U.S. and Middle Eastern countries. The international community will closely watch how this proposal evolves and whether it gains any real support.

The larger implications of this debate touch on critical principles of international law, particularly regarding sovereignty and the rights of displaced populations. North Korea’s sharp response reflects its broader strategic interests but also serves as a reminder of how deeply contentious U.S. foreign policy decisions can be. As reported by VisaVerge.com, disputes like these underline the role of international frameworks in managing conflicts. The international system, despite its flaws, relies on these frameworks to mediate tensions and ensure fairness between nations. Further official information on this topic can be found at the United Nations’ website for international law matters, which offers detailed documentation on these principles (https://legal.un.org).

In conclusion, North Korea’s sharp critique of Trump’s Gaza plan highlights several important global issues. On one hand, it underscores the tense debates over U.S. foreign policy and international norms. On the other, it demonstrates the strategic moves nations like North Korea make to expand their diplomatic influence. This development will likely draw ongoing reactions as countries debate the legality and morality of Trump’s proposal and its implications for Palestine and beyond.

Learn Today

Sovereignty → The right of a state to govern itself without interference from external powers, fundamental in international law.
Hegemonic → Describes the dominance or control of one country or group over others, often politically or economically.
Displaced populations → People forced to leave their homes due to conflict, natural disasters, or other crises, often lacking permanent resettlement.
Imperialism → A policy or practice where a country extends its power and influence through colonization, use of force, or other means.
International norms → Accepted principles or standards guiding how states should act within the global community, ensuring order and fairness.

This Article in a Nutshell

North Korea blasted Trump’s Gaza resettlement proposal, labeling it a “blatant violation” of sovereignty and international law. Criticism is mounting globally, with Pyongyang warning of U.S. “hegemonic” intentions. The plan, seen as destabilizing and dismissive of Palestinian rights, reignites debates on U.S. foreign policy and international norms amid shifting global power dynamics.
— By VisaVerge.com