Key Takeaways
- Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate, was detained by ICE under the Immigration and Nationality Act for pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
- Non-citizen visa holders face deportation risks for political activism, lacking full First Amendment protections granted to U.S. citizens.
- Dean Cobb warns international students against discussing controversial topics online, stressing heightened government monitoring and potential visa consequences.
Columbia University’s Journalism School Dean Jelani Cobb has recently issued a serious warning to international students about the risks they face when expressing their views on sensitive topics online. His caution, “Nobody can protect you,” came shortly after the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and graduate of Columbia University, by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This case has drawn attention to the precarious position of international students, especially those participating in or commenting on politically charged issues.
Mahmoud Khalil was detained under provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Officials claim his involvement in pro-Palestinian demonstrations after the October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel posed a threat to U.S. national interests. While no charges have been formally filed, his case exemplifies how immigration laws can be used to target non-citizens engaged in activities perceived as controversial or contrary to national policies.
Why Dean Jelani Cobb’s Message Matters to Non-U.S. Citizens
Dean Cobb’s message sheds light on the growing concerns for non-U.S. citizens on campus. Specifically, his warning stems from the realization that protections afforded to U.S. citizens do not fully apply to international students. Visa holders, for instance, enjoy neither the same First Amendment safeguards nor immunity from adverse legal actions like deportation.
Columbia University’s legal advisors, like First Amendment expert Stuart Karle, have reiterated the dangers for international students engaging in such topics. Karle advised students to refrain from commenting on contentious subjects like Gaza or Ukraine, particularly on public platforms. The underlying legal risks tied to immigration law make these students vulnerable. ICE and other federal agencies can monitor activism, interpreting it in ways that may harm an individual’s immigration status.
Mahmoud Khalil and the Limits of Free Speech for Visa Holders
Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest has become a symbol of the challenges international students face in balancing their desire to advocate for causes with the legal restrictions of their immigration status. Khalil’s activism on issues like Palestine gained significant attention after he participated in campus protests linked to Hamas, which the U.S. designates as a terrorist organization. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, non-citizens can face deportation for reasons tied to foreign policy or national security. For Khalil, his actions were enough to trigger detention despite the absence of official charges.
The Immigration and Nationality Act provides a legal framework for such actions. Visa holders can be deported for behaviors perceived as being detrimental to U.S. foreign policy, even if those behaviors are constitutionally protected for citizens. Legal experts at Columbia acknowledge the fine line Khalil’s case walks between free speech and policies aimed at national security.
Increasing Government Monitoring on Campuses
The U.S. government has ramped up monitoring of politically sensitive activities by students on visas. Protests or online speech seen as supportive of groups like Hamas or Hezbollah are being closely scrutinized. According to Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, Homeland Security intelligence is being actively used to track such instances. While this surveillance ostensibly targets extremism, there is growing concern that its application disproportionately impacts non-citizen students, particularly those from marginalized or politically sensitive backgrounds.
The current environment has also placed institutions like Columbia University under the microscope. The university has faced criticism for its response to escalating antisemitism on campus. Over the past few years, incidents tied to pro-Palestinian activism, such as the protests involving Mahmoud Khalil, have fueled conflicts between student groups. In a striking development in March 2025, Columbia lost $400 million in federal grants because of its perceived inability to address antisemitism on campus.
What Does This Mean for International Students?
The risks are real and immediate for non-citizen students on U.S. soil. Those studying under F-1 student visas or J-1 exchange visitor visas are particularly exposed. Here are the main concerns:
- Visa Impact: Immigration laws don’t protect personal opinions or political activism. Speaking out, either through protests or public online posts, can lead to visa revocation or even deportation.
- Limited Legal Protections: Unlike U.S. citizens, visa holders don’t have the same level of free speech protections. Immigration laws often prioritize national security over individual rights for non-citizens.
- Social Media Risks: Public posts on platforms like Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook can easily be tracked, taken out of context, and used as evidence in immigration cases.
Legal experts have repeatedly advised international students to be cautious. Karle emphasized the importance of sanitizing personal social media profiles, while Dean Cobb called the current environment “dangerous.” Their messages aren’t mere recommendations—they’re lifelines for students at risk.
How Can Students Protect Themselves?
Here are some steps international students should consider to safeguard themselves in these uncertain times:
- Avoid Controversial Topics Online: While it’s important to have a voice, students should weigh the risks and avoid topics like Gaza or Ukraine that could draw unwanted attention.
- Strengthen Digital Privacy: Making personal profiles private on social media platforms can reduce visibility to authorities or bad actors online.
- Consult Legal Experts: Universities often provide legal resources for international students. Knowing your rights under your visa is crucial.
Columbia University has also made efforts to shield its students. For example, the school recently adopted a new anti-doxing policy designed to protect students from online harassment. However, the effectiveness of such policies remains limited when external governmental agencies are involved.
Bigger Picture: A Strained Academic Environment
The broader ramifications of Khalil’s arrest and Dean Cobb’s remarks extend beyond individual students. Universities and their international communities face mounting pressure. They must balance federal compliance, academic freedom, and an increasing focus on curbing extremism on campuses.
Simultaneously, legislation aimed at holding tech companies accountable for content promoting terrorism could indirectly encourage self-censorship. Platforms hosting politically charged content risk becoming avenues for surveillance—placing more responsibility on universities to provide guidance to international students on navigating these digital challenges.
The Khalil case further highlights the complexity of these issues. His detention in Louisiana under ICE remains unresolved as courts examine claims of selective enforcement. Critics argue that ethnic and religious minorities face disproportionate consequences under U.S. immigration enforcement tactics. These cases underscore the necessity for systemic reform to prevent abuses targeting vulnerable groups.
The Weight of Dean Cobb’s Warning
Dean Jelani Cobb’s caution to international students resonates deeply given the current landscape of U.S. immigration and national security policies. While his words may seem alarming, they reflect the realities for non-citizens who choose to engage politically in the United States.
For universities, Khalil’s case and the broader implications of government monitoring place them at a crossroads. Institutions like Columbia must reconcile their commitment to fostering open dialogue with ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Most importantly, they must protect international students while emphasizing the legal risks tied to their immigration statuses.
For international students, particularly those pursuing higher education in politically charged times, these warnings serve as vital reminders. The intersection of immigration policy, free speech, and global politics continues to evolve. Navigating this terrain requires caution, awareness, and sometimes difficult compromises.
For more information on immigration laws impacting non-U.S. citizens, visit the official U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) page on nonimmigrant visas.
As VisaVerge.com has noted in its recent analysis, international students are an integral part of the academic ecosystem, contributing diverse experiences and perspectives. Yet, the risks they face under U.S. immigration laws require urgent clarification and reform to safeguard their rights and security. Without these changes, cases like Mahmoud Khalil’s may continue to raise unsettling questions about the balance between free speech and national security.
Learn Today
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) → A U.S. federal law that governs immigration and citizenship, outlining grounds for deportation and visa regulations.
F-1 Student Visa → A nonimmigrant visa allowing international students to enter the U.S. for academic studies at approved institutions.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws, including detention and deportation of non-citizens.
First Amendment → Part of the U.S. Constitution protecting freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition, with limited application to non-citizens.
Doxing → Public release of private or identifying information about an individual, often leading to harassment or harm.
This Article in a Nutshell
“International students in the U.S. face unique risks when engaging in political discourse. Columbia’s Dean Jelani Cobb warns, ‘Nobody can protect you.’ Mahmoud Khalil’s ICE detention shows how activism can jeopardize visa holders under immigration laws. To stay safe, students must navigate free speech cautiously, balancing advocacy with legal vulnerabilities.”
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Columbia University Expels Students Over Last Year’s Building Occupation
• What Rights Do Green Card Holders and Foreign Students Have in the U.S.?
• Fewer Indian Students Choose US as Interest in Russia and Germany Grows
• Fewer Indian Students Chose Canada, US, UK for Studies in 2024: Govt
• New Zealand Offers Longer Work Rights to International Students
