ICE to Focus on Deporting Migrant Families, Reopens Two Detention Centers

Key Takeaways

• On March 6, 2025, ICE shifted focus to deporting illegal migrant families, reopening two detention centers to house them.
• ICE can now access the ORR database for information on unaccompanied minors and sponsors, reinstating a Trump-era policy.
• Expedited removal now applies nationwide to undocumented immigrants present for less than two years, bypassing full court hearings.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has introduced a major change to its enforcement policies, now specifically targeting illegal migrant families for deportation. This policy shift, announced on March 6, 2025, also includes the reopening of two detention centers to house these families. While reflecting a more aggressive enforcement stance, this approach has sparked widespread debate.

ICE’s New Priority: Targeting Families and Children

On February 27, 2025, a leaked ICE memo exposed plans for a mass deportation strategy focusing on children who entered the U.S. without their parents. The memo outlined significant steps, including arresting children who have existing deportation orders or missed immigration court dates. In some cases, new legal charges will also be introduced against children who do not yet have official removal orders.

To carry out this plan, ICE has gained permission to use records from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). This federal agency oversees unaccompanied minors who enter the country and releases them to caregivers, like relatives or sponsors. A reinstated policy—dating back to the Trump administration—now allows ICE to access ORR’s database, providing detailed information about these minors and their sponsors. This development has intensified concerns among immigrant advocates, who fear that pursuing children and their sponsors could generate widespread fear and deter people from offering care to vulnerable unaccompanied minors.

Reopening of Detention Centers

To accommodate the expected increase in detained families, two specific facilities are being reactivated:

1. South Texas Family Residential Center: Located in Dilley, Texas, this center has resumed operations under an agreement between ICE and the private prison operator, CoreCivic. The facility can hold up to 2,400 individuals and has a controversial history. During the Trump administration, it faced scrutiny for allegations of poor conditions and its role in family separations.

2. Baldwin Facility: Situated in Baldwin, Michigan, this former prison may also reopen as a detention facility for families. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has reported on negotiations to convert it for immigrant detention purposes. However, specific operational details about this facility are still emerging.

In addition to these locations, CoreCivic has expanded its work with ICE to hold up to 784 detainees at other centers across Mississippi, Nevada, Ohio, and Oklahoma. This aligns with a broader government push to increase detention capacity for immigrants. The goal stated by the Trump administration is to double the daily population in immigration custody, aiming for up to 100,000 detainees across the nation.

Legal and Humanitarian Concerns Surrounding Detentions

The newly intensified focus on illegal migrant families and the reopening of detention centers is not without controversy. Legal and humanitarian organizations have raised alarms about the implications of these actions.

• Due Process Issues: One contentious element is the expansion of “expedited removal,” a process which allows officials to deport individuals quickly without requiring a full court hearing. While expedited removal was once limited to border regions, its nationwide application raises serious concerns over fair treatment. Many detained individuals may lose the opportunity to present their case or argue their eligibility to remain in the U.S.

• Family Separation and Trauma: Targeting children in deportation operations has drawn criticism for potentially separating families. Even unaccompanied minors who may not live with caregivers could face harmful emotional and psychological impacts from detention.

• Access to Legal Help: The administration has also sought to cut programs offering legal aid to unaccompanied minors. This concerns experts because data shows children with attorneys are over seven times more likely to win their cases and avoid deportation. Without legal guidance, many young people may not understand their rights or options in complex immigration systems.

• Impact on U.S. Citizen Children: Beyond unauthorized immigrants, these policies could affect millions of U.S.-born children with undocumented parents. Research indicates that the lives of 5.5 million U.S. citizen children are closely tied to decisions about their parents’ immigration status, heightening fears of family separations.

Broader Shifts in Immigration Policies

The current strategy is part of broader changes under the Trump administration, which has rolled back humanitarian immigration policies while expanding enforcement. Key developments include:

1. Expansion of Expedited Removal: Beginning in January 2025, expedited removal now applies to any undocumented immigrant found anywhere in the U.S., not just near the border. This change allows authorities to deport individuals without court hearings, as long as they have been in the U.S. for less than two years.

2. Increased Border Militarization: The administration continues to prioritize using military personnel, advanced surveillance systems, and expanded border walls to prevent crossings into the U.S.

3. Reduction of Relief Programs: A call has been issued to terminate several humanitarian programs. These include protections for Dreamers—undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children—as well as Temporary Protected Status (TPS) programs, which currently safeguard 700,000 people from deportation due to dangerous conditions in their home countries.

4. Enforcement Quotas: ICE officials have been instructed to significantly increase daily detentions across the U.S. Before 2025, the agency arrested an average of 415 individuals per day. Beginning this year, the target has risen to more than 1,800 arrests per day nationwide.

5. Halting Refugee Resettlements: The administration has paused programs aimed at resettling refugees and granting humanitarian parole to people fleeing conflict zones, including Afghanistan and Ukraine.

Strain on Resources and Potential Legal Battles

The rapid ramp-up of deportation operations and detentions raises practical challenges:

• Facility Overcrowding: The anticipated increase in detained families risks overwhelming ICE detention centers. Crowded conditions could lead to deteriorating living environments for detained individuals.

• Litigation: Many of these policies are likely to face legal challenges. For example, a federal order temporarily stopped attempts to restrict birthright citizenship earlier this year. Amid debates over policies impacting children and families, further legal interventions are expected.

• Economic Implications: Detaining and deporting immigrants also carries hidden financial costs. Many of those targeted are deeply integrated into U.S. communities, holding jobs or contributing to local economies. Deportations could result not only in separated families but also in economic challenges for their communities.

Ongoing Controversy and Uncertainty

The evolving immigration policies reflect broader philosophical debates about the role of enforcement versus compassion in policymaking. As reported by VisaVerge.com, these measures have divided public opinion, especially because family-oriented deportation efforts often impact vulnerable children. Critics argue the administration’s approach overlooks the humane solutions required in handling the complexities of illegal migration. Others, however, support these stricter measures as necessary to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

Amid all the uncertainty, many immigrant advocacy groups, legal aid organizations, and human rights bodies continue to push back against the policies. These groups emphasize that compassion should guide decisions about children, families, and others who rely on U.S. immigration systems for safety and stability.

Conclusion

As ICE makes family deportations and expanded detentions a cornerstone of its strategy, the ripple effects will be felt across immigrant communities, legal systems, and society at large. The reopening of detention centers—like the South Texas Family Residential Center—underscores the government’s commitment to enforcement. Meanwhile, the criticism being leveled at these measures highlights ongoing concerns about fairness, due process, and the social and economic consequences of separating families.

For those directly impacted by these immigration policies, the road ahead remains uncertain. Whether due to rapid deportations or stalled legal cases, each new policy development adds layers of complexity to an already challenging landscape. For accurate information on specific processes or rights, individuals can visit the Department of Homeland Security’s website, which offers reliable updates and resources on immigration enforcement.

Learn Today

Expedited Removal → A fast-track deportation process allowing officials to deport individuals without full court hearings or legal reviews.
Unaccompanied Minors → Children who enter the U.S. without the presence of legal guardians, often requiring special immigration processes or protections.
Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) → A U.S. federal agency managing the care and placement of unaccompanied immigrant minors with sponsors or caregivers.
Temporary Protected Status (TPS) → A program granting temporary safe residency to individuals from countries facing unsafe conditions, like natural disasters or armed conflict.
Family Residential Center → Government-run or private facilities designed to detain immigrant families during immigration processing or deportation proceedings.

This Article in a Nutshell

ICE’s New Family Deportation Policy Sparks Concern
ICE’s March 2025 shift targets illegal migrant families, reigniting two detention centers amid debate. Critics question expedited removals, resource strains, and emotional tolls on children. Supporters argue stricter enforcement is essential. As families face uncertainty, advocates stress the need for humane solutions balancing security with compassion in immigration decisions.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Migrants Speak Out Against Abuse at Guantánamo Bay Detention Center
• New Jersey Rallies for Celal and Emine Emanet After ICE Detention
• Trump’s Immigration Detention Surge Hits 5-Year High, Overwhelms Facilities
• Why Are Virginia’s ICE Detention Centers Seeing Record Growth in 2025?
• Delaney Hall Set to Reopen as ICE’s Largest Detention Center in Newark