Key Takeaways
• Germany moved to deport four activists after a pro-Palestinian protest in Berlin, sparking legal and political controversy.
• The individuals face allegations but have not been convicted, raising concerns over due process and EU freedom of movement rights.
• Civil rights advocates warn the move could set a precedent limiting protest rights and targeting immigrants without clear legal justification.
On October 2024, Germany 🇩🇪 found itself at the center of a growing debate about freedom of speech, civil rights, and immigration after authorities moved to deport four foreign nationals. These four people—a U.S. citizen and three citizens of European Union countries—took part in a pro-Palestinian protest at the Free University of Berlin. The protest was meant to criticize Israel’s military actions in Gaza and Germany’s support for Israel. Now, Germany’s choice to try and deport these individuals has become a turning point that raises many questions about law, human rights, and the future for activists and immigrants in the country.
Who Are the Four Facing Deportation?
The four individuals at the heart of the case all come from outside Germany 🇩🇪, though three are citizens of other European Union countries:
- Cooper Longbottom, 27, a citizen of the United States 🇺🇸
- Kasia Wlaszczyk, described as a Polish cultural worker from Poland 🇵🇱
- Roberta Murray, 31, an Irish artist from Ireland 🇮🇪
- Shane O’Brien, 29, an Irish citizen also from Ireland 🇮🇪
They all took part in the October 2024 protest at Berlin’s Free University, which was one of several events that followed a rise in support for Palestine in different European countries.
What Are the Allegations?
According to German 🇩🇪 authorities, the four are accused of several serious acts during the protest. Specifically, the official allegations are:
- Spreading anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli hate
- Resisting arrest
- Causing property damage
- Disturbing the peace
- Trespassing
- Insulting police officers
- Taking part in disruptive protests
However, and this is an important point, none of them have been convicted of any crime. In fact, as of now, lawyers for the individuals say they still have not seen detailed criminal files or documentation that outlines exactly what each person is alleged to have done. This lack of clear evidence makes the deportation orders highly controversial. Critics, legal experts, and human rights groups have questioned the legal basis for the move, saying that Germany 🇩🇪 is stretching its authority by moving to deport people without a criminal conviction.
The Legal Background—and Why Critics Are Concerned
Under German 🇩🇪 law and under rules that apply across the European Union, immigrants and citizens from other EU countries are not usually deported unless they have committed a very serious crime or are shown to be an active threat to public safety. Tools like the European Union’s freedom of movement rules specifically protect EU citizens so they can live and work in Germany 🇩🇪, except in rare cases where the person is a real danger.
Legal experts pointed out that, usually, the government must have a court conviction or clear proof that the person poses an ongoing risk. This is not the case here. Lawyers for the four say their clients have not even had full legal access to the police files detailing what happened at the protest. This lack of transparency has led some to accuse Germany 🇩🇪 of acting more on political grounds than legal ones.
Many believe these deportation moves are based on political pressure, especially since protests linked to Palestine have gotten more attention since October 2023. At that time, Israel began a new round of military operations in Gaza, and protests across Europe quickly followed.
Political Tensions and Controversy in the Government
The decision to deport these individuals did not come smoothly within Germany’s own government. As reported by VisaVerge.com, several senior Berlin immigration officials objected to the deportation orders. They believed there was not enough evidence to show the individuals posed a real threat, and they worried about acting without a criminal conviction. However, these objections were reportedly overruled by political leaders higher up in the national government.
One of the main reasons officials gave for supporting deportation comes from Germany’s post-Holocaust policy called “reason-of-state.” This doctrine says that the security of Israel is of special importance to Germany 🇩🇪, because of the country’s history during World War II. Those who defend the deportation orders say they are necessary to protect this principle. Critics, though, view the use of this doctrine as being more about making a political point than following the law. They claim it risks undermining basic rights, such as the right to protest and the right to due process—a fair and transparent legal process.
Official Orders and the Deportation Process
Each of the four foreign nationals received formal letters from German 🇩🇪 immigration authorities. The message was direct: their residency rights in Germany 🇩🇩 had been ended, and they had to leave the country by April 21. If they did not leave on their own, the police could physically remove them.
The letters gave no detail about which specific actions each person was alleged to have done. This broad approach upset not only those facing deportation but also many legal observers. They say that if the government can remove people without stating exactly what they did wrong, it could create fear and uncertainty for anyone involved in protest movements or political activism.
All four have decided to fight the orders through the court system. For at least one person, a judge has let them stay in Germany 🇩🇪 during the appeal—a sign that some in the judiciary may be questioning how strong the state’s argument really is.
If you want more details on Germany’s deportation and residency laws, the government posts full information in English on the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community website.
The Bigger Picture: What’s at Stake
This set of cases is not just about four people. Many human rights groups and activists say it touches on much larger questions: Who gets to protest in Germany 🇩🇪? How far can the state go in limiting opposition or solidarity with the Palestinian cause? And, at a fundamental level, what rights do foreigners and immigrants have—especially EU citizens, who are supposed to be protected under freedom of movement laws?
Civil liberties organizations, including groups like Amnesty International, have said that Germany’s response is worrying. They argue that targeting people just for participating in a protest, without proven crimes, goes too far and could make others afraid to express their views. Groups that support Palestinian rights have held rallies and sent open letters urging the government to respect freedom of speech.
However, within German politics, parties from both the left and the right have shown support for strong action against what they see as hate speech or anti-Israeli activism. They argue that in the wake of the Holocaust, Germany 🇩🇪 has a special responsibility to fight anti-Semitism and threats against Israel. This view, while accepted by many in Germany, has led to strong criticism from others who think that it is being stretched too far, and is being used to shut down any dissent linked to Palestine or criticism of Israeli policy.
Legal and Social Impact
The legal impact of these deportation letters could go beyond just these four individuals. Lawyers and rights advocates have warned that if the state is allowed to deport people without criminal convictions, especially EU citizens, the legal standard for removing people could change for everyone. EU rules are clear: deportation should only be used in rare cases involving a real threat, not just on the basis of broad accusations.
Socially, many worry that this kind of government action could divide society. People who support the Palestinian cause, or who take part in protests of all types, may feel less safe. There is concern that the government is encouraging a climate of self-censorship, where people are less likely to speak up or attend demonstrations for fear of losing their right to live in Germany 🇩🇪.
In the media and public debates, some draws have been made between current events and Germany’s past. The country’s own experience with state repression before and during World War II makes its protections for protest and political expression especially important. That is why some politicians, lawyers, and advocacy groups have called for a rethink, urging the government to rely more on evidence and established legal procedures, rather than political arguments.
A Closer Look at Freedom of Expression in Germany
Freedom of speech and assembly are guaranteed in Germany’s constitution, called the Basic Law. However, these rights are not without limits. The government can restrict speech that is considered hate speech or a threat to public order. But, as critics note, the threshold for these exceptions is supposed to be high.
In this case, the fact that none of the four activists have a criminal conviction makes the use of the “public threat” argument controversial. Even some officials in the Berlin city government thought the deportations were not justified. Their concerns were overruled higher up, which raises questions about the balance between bureaucracy and political leadership in sensitive cases.
What Happens Next?
As of early April 2025, the four foreign nationals are fighting to stay in Germany 🇩🇪 using the legal pathways open to them. Some are able to remain while their appeals are heard in court, thanks to judges who see weaknesses in the government’s case. If the state’s argument does not stand up, the result could set an important precedent for how such cases are handled in the future—not just for these four, but for thousands of foreigners living in Germany 🇩🇪.
For now, activists, legal scholars, and concerned citizens are watching closely. This moment could shape what it means to protest, to express unpopular views, and to be an immigrant or even just a visitor in Germany 🇩🇪.
Summary: Why This Case Matters
The move to deport four foreign nationals—an American and three EU citizens—after a pro-Palestinian protest in Berlin is about much more than one day in October 2024. It brings up basic questions about how Germany 🇩🇪 balances its history, its international obligations, political risks, and the rights of residents who may disagree with government policy.
Supporters argue that fighting hate speech and protecting Israel’s security should come first. Opponents say deporting people based on unclear or broad accusations threatens everyone’s rights and sets a dangerous example.
One thing is certain: the eyes of Europe and the world are on Germany 🇩🇪, as the country decides where to draw the line between security and freedom, law and politics, home and exile. The final outcome will shape Germany’s future for immigrants, activists, and anyone who believes in the power—and the risk—of speaking out.
Learn Today
Deportation → The process of removing a non-citizen from a country, often due to legal or regulatory violations, sometimes without a criminal conviction.
Freedom of Movement → The right for European Union citizens to live and work in any EU country unless they pose serious threats.
Anti-Semitic → Language or actions showing prejudice or hostility toward Jewish people and Judaism, strictly condemned by German law and policy.
Reason-of-State → A German political doctrine prioritizing Israel’s security due to historical responsibility after the Holocaust, impacting foreign and domestic policy decisions.
Due Process → The fair, transparent legal procedures guaranteed to individuals, especially before facing penalties such as deportation or loss of residency.
This Article in a Nutshell
Germany’s attempt to deport four activists after a pro-Palestinian protest in Berlin has ignited debate over civil liberties. Accused but not convicted, their cases test the boundaries of political dissent, immigration law, and basic rights. The outcome could reshape Germany’s approach to protest and foreign residents nationwide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Supreme Court halts deportation under Alien Enemies Act
• Supreme Court stops Venezuelan deportations by Trump administration
• UCSD students face F-1 visa terminations and deportation
• White House defends Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s mistaken deportation
• US Judge Stops Deportation of Wisconsin Indian Student
