Key Takeaways
- As of March 7, 2025, the GSA requires reviews and justifications for contracts with ten major consulting firms, including Deloitte and Accenture.
- Federal agencies must identify contracts for termination or justify essential ones with senior official verification by the GSA’s mandate.
- Job security concerns rise as government contract reductions threaten Deloitte and Accenture employees; significant workforce cuts already occurred in 2024.
As of March 7, 2025, employees at Deloitte and Accenture face unsettling uncertainty as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) intensifies its efforts to curb spending on consulting contracts. This shift comes amid a broader push by the Trump administration to reduce federal costs associated with consulting firms. Notably, the General Services Administration (GSA) has issued new rules, requiring federal agencies to reassess contracts with ten major consulting firms, including Deloitte and Accenture.
Recent Developments and New Guidelines
On March 4, 2025, the GSA mandated federal agencies to provide a detailed review of consulting contracts with the top consulting firms. Firms like Deloitte and Accenture are fundamental to government projects, yet they are now at the center of discussions on spending reductions. A striking $65 billion in fees has been allocated to these firms for 2025 and onward, a figure the administration aims to trim significantly. In a strongly worded letter, Acting GSA Administrator Stephen Ehikian emphasized, “This needs to, and must, change,” underlining the administration’s commitment to altering how consulting services are procured and maintained.
According to the GSA’s order, federal agencies are expected to deliver their evaluations promptly. The reports must identify which consulting contracts will be terminated and which will continue. If agencies decide to retain any contracts with the named firms, they must provide a senior official’s verification explaining why the contract is essential and how it provides critical technical support. This requirement applies directly to firms like Deloitte Consulting and Accenture Federal Services.
These measures are part of a renewed strategy, following an earlier initiative from the administration. The prior attempt prompted insufficient action from the agencies, pushing the GSA to demand stronger compliance this time. These steps reflect a growing effort to carefully examine the role and necessity of consulting firms in federal operations.
Job Security Concerns for Deloitte and Accenture Employees
The stringent focus on consulting contracts has sparked deep concerns among employees at Deloitte and Accenture. Both firms heavily depend on government clients, and any significant contract cancellations could directly affect their operations and workforce. The pressure to downsize consulting contracts, coupled with recent layoffs at both organizations, is adding to employee anxiety.
Deloitte and Accenture have already made difficult workforce adjustments in the past months. Deloitte, for instance, cut 250 positions at its UK branch in October 2024 due to performance-related concerns. The situation escalated in November 2024, when an additional 180 employees lost their jobs as part of a firm-wide restructuring. Meanwhile, other consulting giants like EY reported their first workforce reduction in 14 years, with headcounts falling by 2,450 in 2024.
For employees at Deloitte and Accenture, these actions—and the downsizing of contracts with a key client like the U.S. government—pose direct threats to job security. As these two firms navigate this challenging environment, their workers are left to ponder the future.
Broader Trends in the Consulting Industry
The push to reduce consulting expenditures reflects a broader trend across various industries. Many firms are not only reducing reliance on consulting but also reevaluating their broader diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) strategies. Accenture, for example, recently announced that it was discontinuing its global diversity goals and eliminating career-focused programs aimed at specific demographic groups. Similarly, Deloitte decided to do away with email signatures that include gender pronouns, alongside adjusting its diversity goals.
These changes in DEI policies reflect a shift in priorities for large firms, signaling a move toward streamlining operations amidst economic pressures.
Adding more context, Citigroup Inc., another major player outside the consulting space, has signaled similar intent. Citigroup has significantly reduced its DEI initiatives, even going as far as renaming its corresponding team to “Talent Management and Engagement.”
These adjustments to corporate culture and policy suggest that external financial and business pressures are driving consulting firms like Deloitte and Accenture to pivot their long-standing approaches—creating more uncertainty for their employees.
Federal Reviews Affecting Consulting Services
Beyond the GSA’s recent orders, key government departments have taken further initiatives to review and modify how they rely on consultants. The Department of Defense (DOD), as one of the largest spenders on consulting services, is leading this shift. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has directed his department to conduct a comprehensive evaluation with the express intention of eliminating or scaling back unnecessary consulting activities. In his directive, Hegseth stressed the importance of ensuring that every contract serves a statutory purpose critical to the department’s mission.
Similarly, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has embarked on plans to reevaluate consulting contracts. Initially, the VA moved forward with contract cancellations, which were projected to save taxpayers nearly $2 billion. However, these actions are currently on hold for further scrutiny, as concerns arose regarding the potential impact on services for veterans.
The actions of both the DOD and the VA highlight a broader effort to reconsider and reshape how federal agencies interact with consulting firms. For companies like Deloitte and Accenture, this means a heightened risk of losing federal business, which could significantly disrupt their long-term ability to generate revenue from government clients.
Points of Debate
While the government is optimistic about potential cost reductions, the effectiveness of these measures has sparked controversy. For example, DOGE recently reported that nearly 40% of 2,300 terminated contracts are expected to yield no real savings. This is because most funds tied to these contracts have already been obligated under the original agreements, meaning the government is still legally bound to spend them. Despite this, DOGE continues to insist that its initiatives will save nearly $10 billion. However, independent analysts are skeptical of the actual financial impact.
In the midst of this uncertainty, one thing is clear: Deloitte and Accenture, among other firms, must prepare for a significant shift in the volume and nature of contracts they may secure from the federal government in the coming years.
The Path Ahead for Employees at Deloitte and Accenture
Although the reductions in consulting contracts are designed to curb federal spending, the implications for the industry are far-reaching. Employees at Deloitte and Accenture may face a prolonged period of uncertainty as agencies adjust to the GSA’s new requirements. For workers directly involved in federal consulting projects, there may be a need to pivot their skills or seek opportunities outside the government sector.
Additionally, consulting firms may attempt to diversify their client base to compensate for anticipated losses in federal contracts. They could explore private-sector opportunities to stabilize their operations, but this will take time and may not offer immediate solutions for employees losing government-related roles.
Federal procurement changes are bound to alter the nature of consulting firms’ hiring and operational strategies. Job seekers and current employees may need to evaluate how their skills align with emerging demands in a rapidly changing industry.
Final Thoughts
As of this moment, the future remains uncertain for workers at Deloitte and Accenture. The GSA’s push for greater scrutiny in consulting contracts is indicative of a larger effort by the Trump administration to manage federal expenditures responsibly. For consulting firms, this move signifies more than just financial adjustments—it signals an urgent need to adapt and re-strategize.
For employees, the impacts extend well beyond current developments. As government clients reassess their spending priorities, adjustments are likely to shape not only existing projects but also the job market in the consulting industry for months to come. Staying informed will be key for workers navigating this challenging path forward.
For more information on GSA contracts and procurement rules, you can visit the official GSA website. Additionally, VisaVerge.com provides detailed insights into the intersection of business strategy, government policies, and workplace trends.
Learn Today
General Services Administration (GSA) → A U.S. federal agency managing government property and procurement, including contracts with private entities like consulting firms.
Federal procurement → The process by which U.S. government agencies acquire goods and services from external organizations or contractors.
Statutory purpose → A legally defined and mandated objective that government expenditures or programs must fulfill to comply with federal laws.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) → Corporate policies and initiatives aimed at fostering workplace diversity, equal opportunity, and inclusive practices.
Obligated funds → Money that a government agency has committed through contracts or agreements, which must still be spent as required.
This Article in a Nutshell
Uncertainty looms for Deloitte and Accenture employees as federal agencies, under GSA orders, reevaluate consulting contracts. With $65 billion at stake, contract cuts could reshape operations and job security. Amid broader shifts in consulting and DEI strategies, adapting skills and exploring non-government opportunities may be vital for workers navigating this evolving industry.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Immigration Court Faces Strain as Staff Depart While Backlogs Grow
• Spirit Airlines Passenger Faces Consequences After Clash with Staff
• B.C. Hospitals Face Staffing Strain as Immigration Cuts Take Effect
• Former Staffers Claim TCS Misused US Visas to Bypass H-1B Limits
• Trump Administration Orders U.S. Embassies to Cut Staff Worldwide
