Key Takeaways
• Liberals propose lowering permanent resident cap to 395,000 in 2025, with further reductions likely until at least 2027.
• Conservatives tie newcomer numbers directly to available housing and jobs, promising tougher controls and stricter enforcement on all visas.
• Both parties scale back immigration growth due to public concerns over housing shortages, crowded services, and rising living costs.
Immigration policy is at the center of Canada’s 2025 Election, with the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party offering noticeably different approaches. Voters, newcomers, and employers are all watching these proposals, knowing that big changes could come no matter who wins. In this comparison, we break down what each party promises, what it means for people wanting to move to Canada 🇨🇦, and how this could shape the country for years to come.
Changing Times: Why Immigration Matters in the 2025 Election

After the pandemic, Canada 🇨🇦 pushed its immigration numbers to record highs. Both the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party now say this pace has caused real problems—especially with not enough homes, crowded schools, and long waits to see doctors. As reported by VisaVerge.com, many people in Canada 🇨🇦 are worried about how fast the population is growing and how it affects daily life.
This means the two major parties are reconsidering how many newcomers should arrive each year and how to match that growth with enough housing, jobs, and services. Let’s look at exactly what each party says they will do.
The Liberal Party: Careful Pause and Focus on Capacity
What the Liberals Propose
The Liberal Party, under the new leadership of Mark Carney, has chosen to “hit pause” after years of big increases in the number of newcomers. Here’s how their main ideas shape up for the 2025 election:
- Permanent Resident Targets: The Liberals plan to lower the number of new permanent residents each year, with a goal of 395,000 in 2025, and even fewer in later years. These lower numbers could last until at least 2027.
- Temporary Resident Cuts: The Liberal Party is also cutting back on temporary visas, including international students and temporary foreign workers.
-
Reason Behind These Cuts: Mark Carney and the party admit that the country was not ready for so many new people at once. They say there isn’t enough housing, schools, or doctors. The party calls these lower numbers a “course correction.” Carney has made it clear the caps will stay until there are enough homes for everyone.
-
What Does This Mean for Newcomers?
- Anyone looking to move to Canada 🇨🇦—whether as a permanent immigrant, student, or worker—will face tighter limits.
- There are no promises to raise these numbers soon, and there’s no clear list of steps for when these caps might change. The only plan is to wait until there are more homes and social services built.
How the Liberals Talk About Immigration
- More About the Economy Than Immigration: For this election, Carney is not saying much about immigration unless asked. He focuses more on money-related matters and how Canada 🇨🇦 relates to the United States 🇺🇸.
- No Big New Plans or Promises: The Liberal Party is not talking about using immigration to boost Canada’s economy or fix labor shortages, unlike some previous years. They only mention wanting to attract skilled people in a general way.
The Conservative Party: Even Tighter Controls and Big Changes
What the Conservatives Promise to Do
Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party are taking an even tougher line than the Liberals. Here is how their plan stands out:
- Cap Tied to Housing and Jobs: The Conservatives say the number of new people should never go above how many new homes are built or how many jobs are open. This means if there aren’t enough homes or jobs one year, fewer newcomers that year.
- Strong Language on the Problems: Poilievre calls the Liberal Party’s past choices “radical.” He blames them for higher living costs, crowded schools and hospitals, and says they have lost control of the borders.
-
Ending the Century Initiative: The Conservatives promise to scrap big projects like the Century Initiative, which wanted Canada 🇨🇦 to grow to 100 million people by the year 2100.
-
Temporary Residents Get More Limits: There would be fewer international students and temporary workers. In Quebec, the province would have a bigger say in who can come. Temporary foreign workers could only get in for certain jobs that really can’t be filled by Canadians, such as some farm work.
-
Tougher Rules and Enforcement: The Conservative Immigration Policy would mean:
- Making sure people cannot make fake asylum or temporary resident claims.
- Stronger and faster criminal checks.
- Quicker deportations if someone loses their right to stay.
- More tracking of people who leave or overstay.
- Capping how many asylum seekers can enter.
How the Conservatives Talk About Immigration
- Law-and-Order, Not Opportunity: The main message is about restoring order and safety, not about economic growth from newcomers.
- Regional Flexibility: They want provinces, especially Quebec, to have more ability to decide who comes in as a temporary resident.
- No Details On Raising Numbers: So far, they have not announced any national targets, just the rule that newcomers should never be more than what the country’s homes and jobs can take.
Point-by-Point Comparison
To make these differences clearer, the table below shows how the parties stack up on the main issues:
Policy Area | Liberal Party | Conservative Party |
---|---|---|
Overall Approach | Cautious pause; keep lower caps until housing improves. | Tight controls; never allow newcomers to outnumber homes or jobs. |
Targets/Numbers | 395,000 permanent residents in 2025; more cuts planned in next years. | No set national number; always below housing and jobs available. |
Temporary Residents | Numbers stay down until further notice. | Extra-tight rules. Only allow for clear labor shortages, province gets more say. |
Housing/Infrastructure | Future growth based on progress in building homes/services. | Only allow as many newcomers as the country has homes, jobs, and clinics for. |
Economy | Less talk about benefits. Focus is on fixing local shortages. | Focus only on risks/costs. Few plans to use immigration for economic needs. |
Refugees/Asylum | Keeps current levels, but growing concern about border surges. | Crackdown on fraud; faster removals; fewer allowed in. |
Tone | Pragmatic, less focus on immigration in campaign speeches. | Law-and-order theme. Says system is broken under Liberals. |
What’s Behind These Differences?
Both the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party have dialed down their support for higher immigration. The reason? Public opinion has shifted. Many Canadians worry about finding homes they can afford and about services not keeping up.
The Liberals: Slower, Safer, But Not Clear on Future Growth
The Liberal Party hopes that by cutting back now, it can “stabilize” the system. However, there is no set plan for when or how to raise the numbers again. This “wait and see” method means that newcomers and those hoping to bring families to Canada 🇨🇦 face real uncertainty.
- Pros: This approach may help slow down rent increases and pressure on schools/hospitals. It could also give communities time to “catch up.”
- Cons: There is no pathway for increasing immigration for jobs or economic needs, even if companies or schools want more international talent.
The Conservatives: Control First, Opportunity Later
The Conservative Immigration Policy makes control and order the top priorities. If elected, changes would happen quickly, especially in:
- Lowering new arrivals, especially temporary residents
- Making it much harder to claim asylum or get a temporary visa
- Putting strong limits on all kinds of visas if housing and jobs are tight
- Pros: This could satisfy people worried about population growth and housing prices. It promises more checks and faster action on people with no legal right to stay.
- Cons: Some industries and regions may struggle to fill jobs if fewer international workers or students are allowed. There could be less cultural and economic growth from newcomers.
Regional Spotlight: Quebec Gets a Special Deal
One of the biggest changes in the Conservative plan is more control for Quebec. The province already picks many of its immigrants, but Poilievre’s plan would let Quebec make its own rules for temporary residents too. This could lead to very different immigration numbers and rules in Quebec compared to the rest of Canada 🇨🇦.
Key Trends and What’s at Stake
Both parties have stepped away from “open door” policies of past decades. Now, the fight is over how much—and how quickly—to cut new arrivals. More people see immigration as a test of local resources rather than a route to growth.
- Results for Newcomers: It will be harder to get into Canada 🇨🇦, at least for the next few years. Entry will depend not just on your skills but also where you want to live and if that region needs more people.
- For Employers and Schools: They could have a tougher time bringing in workers or students from abroad, possibly leading to local shortages in skilled jobs or research talent.
The Big Picture: What Should Voters Watch For?
Voters are choosing between two main ideas:
– Liberal Party: Take a break, fix the basics first (like homes and services), and then think about more people in the future, but with no set timeline or steps.
– Conservative Party: Put the brakes on even harder, tie all newcomer numbers to resources like housing and jobs, and push strict rules to stop abuse and fraud.
Both reflect a wider mood—people want security and local needs met before opening the door to more newcomers. But they differ sharply on how much risk Canada 🇨🇦 should take and how much opportunity the country should offer.
For more official information about Canada’s immigration goals and current rules, you can visit the official Government of Canada Immigration website.
Wrapping Up: The Road to April 28th and Beyond
The 2025 election will set the direction for Canada’s immigration system for years ahead. This is not just about numbers—it’s about how fast the country grows, where people settle, and how well everyone can get by. The Liberal Party is offering a “steady as she goes” slowdown, promising to raise numbers only when the basics work better. The Conservative Party offers a more dramatic slowdown, putting control and enforcement above opportunity or growth.
No matter which side wins, big changes are coming for newcomers hoping to call Canada 🇨🇦 home. Both parties have moved far from the old days of ambitious expansion. Now, the key question is not just “how many” but “can we handle it”—and how strictly the rules are written and forced.
For those considering a move, and for employers and schools that rely on new arrivals, understanding these differences is vital as Canada’s 2025 Election approaches. The answer on April 28th will not just decide who gets in—but how, and why.
VisaVerge.com will continue to provide updates as these important immigration debates unfold.
Learn Today
Permanent Resident → A person granted the right to live and work in Canada indefinitely but who is not a Canadian citizen.
Temporary Resident → Someone allowed to stay in Canada for a limited time as a student, worker, or visitor, under specific visas.
Century Initiative → A proposal aimed at growing Canada’s population to 100 million by 2100, now opposed by Conservatives.
Asylum Seeker → A person requesting legal protection in Canada due to fear of persecution in their home country.
Quota/Caps → Predetermined limits set by the government to control the number of immigrants or temporary residents allowed each year.
This Article in a Nutshell
Canada’s 2025 Election centers on immigration. Liberals pause increases, promising lower caps until housing improves. Conservatives go further, tying newcomers to actual jobs and homes, promising tighter enforcement. Both focus on security and capacity, moving away from previous expansive policies. Big changes loom for newcomers, employers, and schools nationwide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• 287(g) immigration enforcement program expands to Mid-Michigan sheriffs
• FBI leads immigration enforcement raid at Beaver County restaurant
• Oklahoma State Superintendent proposes immigration status checks in schools
• Immigration Officials detain day laborers at Pomona Home Depot
• Catholic Charities cuts refugee resettlement amid immigration reforms