Key Takeaways
• President Marcos vetoed House Bill No. 8839, denying Philippine citizenship to Chinese national Li Duan Wang.
• Wang was linked to POGOs and controversies, including illegal activities, raising national security concerns.
• The 2025 veto reflects a broader crackdown on offshore gambling, aligning policy with public welfare priorities.
On April 11, 2025, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. vetoed House Bill No. 8839, a proposal that sought to grant Philippine citizenship to Chinese national Li Duan Wang. This decision, coming after the bill received overwhelming Senate approval with a 19-1 vote earlier this year, has drawn widespread attention due to Wang’s alleged connections to Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs) and other controversies. President Marcos’s action reflects his administration’s prioritization of national security and commitment to deterring potential risks posed by offshore gambling and related industries.
The Context of the Citizenship Bid
Li Duan Wang, also known by his Philippine alias, Mark Ong, is no ordinary applicant for naturalization. His case has attracted scrutiny for alleged links to POGOs, entities that run online gambling operations catering mostly to Chinese nationals. While POGOs have contributed to the Philippine economy, they have also become associated with criminal activities, including human trafficking, money laundering, and ties to organized crime. For many critics, Wang’s reported associations with these operations were sufficient to warrant a more rigorous evaluation of his citizenship bid.
One of his critics, Senator Risa Hontiveros, highlighted alarming “red flags” in Wang’s background. He has been described as a junket operator linked with the Nine Dynasty Casino, a prominent entity within the POGO sector. Junket operators are intermediaries that attract wealthy gamblers to casinos, but their operations have frequently been implicated in money-laundering schemes. Additionally, Hontiveros pointed to Wang’s connections with Duanren Wu, a key figure tied to a notorious POGO hub in Pampanga that has been raided for illegal activities in the past. Wang was also linked to She Zhijiang, a known Chinese spy, as well as the Philippine Jinjiang Yuxi Association—an organization suspected of being part of China’s United Front. The latter has raised concerns about foreign influence on Philippine domestic and political affairs.
Perhaps most troubling, Senator Hontiveros revealed irregularities in Wang’s records, including multiple taxpayer identification numbers—a clear violation of Philippine law. These factors collectively painted a concerning picture of Wang as someone whose background and affiliations raised doubts about his eligibility for Philippine citizenship.
The Presidential Veto and Its Justifications
In a firm response, President Marcos cited national interest and security concerns as the main reasons for the veto. “I am unable to blindly ignore the alarming and revealing warnings raised by our relevant national agencies that find the subject grantee’s character and influence to be full of ominous and dire consequences,” Marcos stated in his veto message. This rejection highlights his administration’s insistence that Philippine citizenship should only be extended to individuals who meet both legal and ethical requirements.
This decision is consistent with President Marcos’s broader actions against POGOs. In July 2024, his administration introduced a sweeping ban on offshore gambling operators, citing increased criminal activity such as human trafficking and financial fraud. That move led to the expulsion of approximately 20,000 foreign workers, the majority of them Chinese nationals, from Philippine shores. The ban marked a significant shift in national policy, prioritizing long-term security and social welfare over short-term economic gains.
By vetoing Wang’s citizenship, President Marcos is delivering a clear message: individuals linked to industries or organizations tied to illegal or harmful activities will not be granted the privilege of becoming Philippine citizens. This adds to the administration’s broader fight against the persistent challenges posed by offshore gambling in the country.
Public and Legislative Reactions
The veto has triggered mixed reactions from lawmakers and the public. Senator Hontiveros, who was instrumental in bringing Wang’s questionable affiliations to light, openly praised the President’s decision. She called it a critical step toward protecting the nation’s sovereignty and ensuring that Philippine citizenship remains a privilege reserved for those who uphold the law and positively contribute to society.
Yet, not all legislators agreed with the veto. Senate President Francis Escudero noted that the Senate thoroughly reviewed Wang’s application, emphasizing adherence to procedural norms in the legislative process. Similarly, Senator Sherwin Gatchalian argued that officials had found no concrete evidence linking Wang to direct involvement in illegal POGO activities. These differing perspectives reveal a broader challenge in balancing public safety concerns with legislative integrity when vetting naturalization cases.
Implications for Philippine-China Relations
The veto also carries potential repercussions for the Philippines’ diplomatic relationship with China 🇨🇳. Although this specific case has not yet resulted in overt tensions, it could signal a broader intent by the Philippines to scrutinize the presence and influence of Chinese nationals and investments within its borders. The rejection of Wang’s citizenship application may be understood as a reaffirmation of the country’s vigilance against external influences that could undermine local interests or security.
That said, China and the Philippines maintain robust trade relations, and both governments have cooperated on various infrastructural and developmental projects. The broader implications of this case on bilateral ties will depend on how the two nations navigate their shared interests amid differing national priorities.
Revisiting Citizenship Policies and Naturalization Laws
Wang’s case has brought renewed attention to the need for reforms in Philippine naturalization laws. The controversy underscores how citizenship applications must be rigorously evaluated to prevent potential risks. Strengthening collaboration between legislative bodies, intelligence agencies, and other governmental institutions is essential to ensure that only those who meet stringent ethical and legal standards are granted the privilege of citizenship.
For many observers, the case also marks a cautionary tale about the balance between openness to foreign nationals and the risks of unregulated naturalization. While the Philippines has historically embraced immigrants who contribute to its development and culture, safeguarding against applicants with questionable backgrounds is critical to maintaining the trust and safety of Filipino citizens.
Solidifying the Crackdown on POGOs
President Marcos’s decision to veto Wang’s application plays into his administration’s larger effort to dismantle offshore gambling industries that have been marred by corruption and criminal activities. Many of the same issues highlighted during this veto—links to human trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime—are the very concerns that prompted the nationwide POGO ban in 2024. Despite losing significant revenue streams, the decision reflected the administration’s resolve to prioritize public welfare and national integrity.
Notably, while the ban marked a considerable policy shift, enforcement remains a challenge. Residual elements of POGO-linked operations may persist in other guises, posing ongoing risks. Wang’s case serves as a reminder of why continued vigilance is necessary to address these challenges comprehensively.
Conclusion
President Marcos’s veto of House Bill No. 8839 symbolizes a pivotal moment in the Philippine government’s approach to citizenship and national security. By rejecting Li Duan Wang’s naturalization bid, the administration has reiterated its stance that Philippine citizenship is a privilege reserved for those who align with the country’s laws, ethical values, and security priorities.
The decision also serves as a broader lesson on the importance of reexamining policies concerning naturalization, offshore gambling, and foreign influence. Wang’s case exposes vulnerabilities in the system, catalyzing needed conversations on how to ensure that only deserving individuals are granted access to the rights and responsibilities of Philippine citizenship.
As the Philippines pursues this course, continued vigilance, transparent governance, and collaboration with relevant agencies will be critical in building trust. Ultimately, the Marcos administration’s firm stance, as seen in this veto, reflects a vision of protecting national interests and security above all else. For further insights on Philippines immigration policies and legal changes, visit the Bureau of Immigration’s Official Website.
Learn Today
House Bill No. 8839 → A proposed legislation to grant Philippine citizenship to Chinese national Li Duan Wang, ultimately vetoed in 2025.
Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs) → Companies running online gambling platforms targeting mainly Chinese nationals, criticized for links to crime and human trafficking.
Naturalization → A legal process through which a foreign individual is granted citizenship of a country under certain conditions.
Junket Operators → Intermediaries who attract wealthy gamblers to casinos, often scrutinized for involvement in money laundering activities.
United Front → A strategy by China aimed at influencing foreign governments and societies to align with Beijing’s political interests.
This Article in a Nutshell
On April 11, 2025, President Marcos vetoed Li Duan Wang’s naturalization bid over alleged POGO links, citing national security threats. This decision reinforces the administration’s policy against offshore gambling industries and stresses citizenship as a privilege for lawful and ethical individuals contributing positively to Philippine society.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• House approves SAVE Act requiring proof of citizenship to vote
• Mayotte faces new limits on birthright citizenship under French law
• Canadian citizenship fees increase for the first time in years
• HUD requires citizenship or residency for FHA loans
• Trump revisits birthright citizenship through old court case
