Key Takeaways
• ICE detained green card holder Mahmoud Khalil on March 9, 2025, citing alleged ties to Hamas despite no criminal charges.
• Secretary Rubio announced on March 10, 2025, a policy to revoke visas and green cards of Hamas-linked individuals, sparking legal challenges.
• U.S. District Judge Furman temporarily blocked Khalil’s deportation, raising questions about due process and expanding risks for lawful permanent residents.
The March 9, 2025 arrest of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder and Columbia University 🇺🇸 graduate student, has sparked heated debates surrounding immigration protections for both foreign students and permanent residents in the United States. ICE agents detained Khalil at his residence, citing claims about links to a terrorist group, and this case could signal a broad policy shift with implications for millions.
Arrest Raises Legal and Political Questions

On the surface, Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest appears tied to immigration violations. ICE originally cited the revocation of Khalil’s student visa as the reason for his detention. However, Khalil’s status as a green card holder—a legal permanent resident—complicated matters. When it became clear he held a green card, agents reportedly changed their approach, stating they would also revoke his green card, according to Khalil’s legal team. Critics have pointed out that Khalil hasn’t been charged with a crime, raising concerns about whether this detention respects due process.
U.S. law outlines specific conditions under which a green card can be revoked, including being convicted of certain crimes like fraud or offenses deemed to involve “moral turpitude.” However, Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest stems not from a documented crime but from allegations that he engaged in activities supporting Hamas, a group the U.S. designates as a terrorist organization. Khalil’s attorney, Amy Greer, contends that the charges are baseless and part of a strategy to stifle student activism and political expression. She specifically accused U.S. officials of targeting students at Columbia University for their public criticism of Israel’s military actions in Gaza.
Green Card Holders’ Vulnerabilities: Policy Shift in Action
Historically, green card holders have enjoyed strong legal protections. Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer, a Cornell Law School professor, stated, “Green card holders should be the most protected short of a U.S. citizen.” However, the arrest of Khalil reveals how priorities under the Trump administration have shifted. More significantly, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on March 10, 2025, that the U.S. would revoke green cards and visas of individuals suspected of supporting Hamas. This sweeping announcement places many lawful residents—among them, green card holders—at potential risk even if they are not convicted of crimes.
Recent statistics show the United States is home to nearly 13 million green card holders, with about 10 million eligible to become U.S. citizens. For this demographic, expanded deportation warnings introduce an atmosphere of uncertainty that extends beyond Khalil’s case. The implications may deter permanent residents from engaging in political discourse or participating in protests, even if these actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Foreign Students Becoming Legal Targets
Foreign students, like Mahmoud Khalil prior to receiving his green card, make up a substantial portion of highly skilled immigrants in the United States. But Khalil’s experience demonstrates that student visas, already precarious, are even more at risk under shifting immigration policies. Historically, grounds for student visa revocations have included failing to meet academic requirements or arrests for specific offenses, such as driving under the influence. However, including participation in political activities as grounds for visa removal appears unprecedented.
The chilling effect of such policies on foreign students cannot be overstated. Many students who come to the United States for education, research, or civic engagement may pull back from expressing political opinions or fearfully avoid protesting issues that matter to them. Such barriers could stifle intellectual exchange, a hallmark of American universities like Columbia University 🇺🇸.
Khalil’s Arrest: A Legal Challenge in Progress
Khalil’s case has already entered the judicial system. On March 10, 2025, the day after his arrest, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman blocked Khalil’s deportation temporarily. In his ruling, the judge ordered that Khalil “shall not be removed from the United States unless and until the Court orders otherwise.” This decision ensures time for the judiciary to thoroughly examine the legal standing of his detention and deportation.
While the administration claims Khalil’s activities align with Hamas, Khalil’s defenders argue there’s no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. The case will likely test the limits of existing immigration laws and may lead to intensified legal scrutiny over the Trump administration’s interpretations of national security risks.
Campus and Institutional Responses
Columbia University 🇺🇸, where Khalil was instrumental in organizing campus protests, has taken a neutral yet supportive stance. University officials emphasized their commitment to complying with legal requirements while supporting their diverse student body. However, they urged authorities to secure judicial warrants when executing enforcement actions at campus residences.
Khalil’s role as a negotiator during 2024 anti-Israel demonstrations brought student concerns directly to university leadership. His detention has fostered anxiety among both students and faculty at Columbia University 🇺🇸, especially for foreign nationals and permanent residents involved in social activism. The larger question remains: Will this incident discourage foreign students from exercising their rights to free speech and assembly, even in spaces traditionally considered safe havens for debate like college campuses?
Shifts in Immigration Policy: Broader Context
The Khalil case did not emerge in isolation. It reflects broader trends in immigration enforcement stemming from the GOP’s 2024 platform and related policy goals. One key document, known as “Project Esther,” seeks to curb antisemitism but controversially links pro-Palestinian activism to support for Hamas. The platform calls for “revoking visas of those supporting jihadi terrorism abroad” and “deporting pro-Hamas radicals.”
Supporters of these policies, including Trump-appointed border czar Tom Homan, view them as necessary steps to safeguard national security. On the other hand, legal experts see potential overreach, particularly when political activism is equated with terrorism. Critics argue this may set dangerous precedents that weaken constitutional freedoms for all residents, regardless of citizenship status.
Criticism and Support Within the U.S.
Khalil’s situation has fueled contrasting responses both within the political sphere and among the public. Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by Senator Dick Durbin, described Khalil’s detention as “straight-up authoritarianism” and akin to dark chapters of U.S. history, such as the McCarthy era. President Trump, however, defended the move, saying this marked the beginning of a broader effort to protect national interests by targeting what he described as “radical foreign pro-Hamas students.”
These clashing perspectives create an environment where longstanding norms regarding political engagement, civil rights, and student protections face existential challenges. For green card holders, the stakes are particularly high, as even minor suspicions could now lead to detention or forced removal.
Diplomacy and International Concerns
The arrest of Mahmoud Khalil carries potential diplomatic repercussions that could extend beyond U.S. borders. Khalil is a national of Syria 🇸🇾, a country already entangled in diplomatic tensions with the United States. Though Syria’s government has not yet issued statements on this case, incidents like these may heighten concerns for other foreign nationals at risk of similar treatment.
Further, this policy’s global implications may affect the United States’ ability to attract international students and professionals, as it has long been regarded as a hub for higher education and innovative industries.
Conclusion: Legal Rights vs. National Security
The detainment and subsequent policy decisions surrounding Mahmoud Khalil have ignited a critical examination of where the U.S. draws boundaries between protecting national security and respecting the rights of legal residents. Columbia University 🇺🇸, a symbol of free thought and inquiry, finds itself at the crossroads of this unfolding narrative. The coming months will likely shape precedent-setting decisions that determine whether political activism is safeguarded or placed under tighter constraints.
As legal battles play out, the case raises urgent questions about what protections green card holders and international students can reasonably expect under evolving immigration policies. For now, the anxiety generated by Khalil’s arrest paints a restrictive picture of civil liberties for non-citizens in the United States—one that could reshape how global talent views opportunities in America.
For official guidance on green card policies and rights, visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) website here. As VisaVerge.com notes, cases like Mahmoud Khalil’s could serve as a bellwether for future immigration trends in a politically polarized America.
Learn Today
Green Card Holder → A legal permanent resident of the U.S. with rights to live and work indefinitely, but not full citizenship.
ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) → A U.S. agency enforcing immigration laws, including detention and deportation of foreign nationals.
Moral Turpitude → Concept in immigration law referring to actions contrary to justice, honesty, or moral standards, often affecting visa eligibility.
Due Process → Legal right ensuring fairness through established laws and procedures before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property.
Visa Revocation → Official cancellation of a visa, rendering it invalid and often leading to loss of legal status in the U.S.
This Article in a Nutshell
Khalil’s Arrest Sparks Immigration Debate
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest highlights growing risks for foreign residents in the U.S. Alleged ties to Hamas threaten his green card and raise questions about due process. Critics warn this targets student activism while undermining civil liberties. Will immigration policy stifle free speech or protect national security? Time will tell.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Another US Flight of Deported Immigrants to Arrive in Pakistan Next Week
• For Immigrants to the U.S., a Broken Healthcare System Looms Larger Than Visas
• Does Detention Always Mean Deportation for Illegal Immigrants in the US?
• Immigrants and U.S. Citizens Take Legal Action Over End of Parole Programs
• 126 Immigrants Face Charges for Returning to the U.S. After Removal