Key Takeaways
• On March 19, 2025, Diego Ibarra received a 48-month prison sentence, while Argenis Ibarra was sentenced to time served.
• Both brothers entered the U.S. illegally in 2023, used counterfeit green cards, and now face deportation under ICE custody.
• The Laken Riley Act, enacted in 2025, strengthens immigration enforcement, enabling deportation for undocumented individuals committing certain crimes.
The tragic murder of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old University of Georgia nursing student, sent shockwaves across the United States, igniting intense debates on immigration policies and public safety. More than a year after her murder, linked legal cases continue to unfold. Brothers of Riley’s convicted murderer, Jose Antonio Ibarra, now face deportation after being caught for using fraudulent green cards. Diego and Argenis Ibarra’s cases provide an alarming insight into the challenges posed by fraudulent documentation and illegal immigration, all while drawing attention to larger systemic issues within U.S. immigration.
Sentencing and Legal Proceedings for the Ibarra Brothers

On March 19, 2025, Diego Jose Ibarra and Argenis Ibarra were sentenced separately in federal court. Both pleaded guilty to possessing counterfeit green cards, a discovery tied to the wider investigation into Laken Riley’s murder. Despite being legally unconnected to Riley’s killing, their actions have invited heightened scrutiny of immigration enforcement and undocumented immigrant activities.
Diego, aged 29, received a 48-month prison sentence after admitting to possessing two counterfeit green cards in 2024. Following his release, he will be transferred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with deportation to Venezuela imminent. His younger brother, Argenis, aged 25, received a more lenient sentence of time served, owing to his detention since February 2024. Unlike Diego, Argenis was immediately placed in ICE custody after his sentencing and is currently undergoing deportation processing.
The brothers’ consequences demonstrate how fraudulent documents can lead to severe legal actions. Their cases have reopened discussions on how enforcement agencies should handle undocumented individuals who engage in criminal acts or violate immigration laws.
The Disturbing Connection to Laken Riley’s Murder
The broader context surrounding Diego and Argenis’s arrest ties back to the murder of Laken Riley, an aspiring nurse with a bright future. On February 22, 2024, Riley was jogging on a trail near her university in Athens, Georgia, when she encountered Jose Antonio Ibarra. According to prosecutors, Jose attempted to assault Riley and, when she resisted, fatally injured her. Evidence such as surveillance footage, DNA under Riley’s nails, and physical injuries linking Jose to the scene were pivotal in his trial.
In November 2024, Jose was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. This conviction offered partial closure to Riley’s grieving family but also intensified investigations into his background and connections, ultimately leading to the legal troubles of Diego and Argenis. Public outrage over Riley’s murder fueled debates over immigration enforcement gaps that allowed Jose, an undocumented immigrant, to enter and remain in the United States.
Illegal Entry and Discovery of Fraudulent Documents
Both Diego and Argenis entered the United States illegally in 2023, following their older brother’s arrival. Diego crossed near El Paso, Texas, in April 2023 and, after brief detention, was released under the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program, which required wearing an ankle monitor. However, Diego violated these monitoring conditions by cutting off the bracelet and evading authorities. Argenis, on the other hand, was initially expelled after crossing near Eagle Pass, Texas, but succeeded in re-entering near El Paso shortly after. Upon his unlawful return, he was released with a notice to appear in immigration court, but no significant monitoring followed.
The duo remained undetected until February 2024, when authorities investigating Laken Riley’s death uncovered forged documentation. While examining the living arrangements of the suspects, police found Diego in possession of counterfeit green cards, further implicating him in illegal activities. Around the same time, Argenis was discovered to have a fake green card when assisting officials during the ongoing investigation. Both brothers resided in the same Athens, Georgia home, shared with their roommate Rosbeli Flores-Bello, who was also tied to false documentation.
Diego’s Ties to Organized Crime
While Diego’s use of forged green cards is inherently criminal, investigators also exposed his involvement with a Venezuelan gang known as Tren de Aragua, a group implicated in drug trafficking, human smuggling, and violent crimes. Tattoos and social media evidence linked him to this infamous gang, raising questions about organized criminal activity among undocumented immigrants in the United States.
Diego’s criminal activity extended beyond fraudulent documents. He faced prior arrests for driving under the influence (DUI), shoplifting, and skipping court appearances. These compounding offenses contributed to his lengthy prison sentence. Although Argenis had no known gang ties or significant criminal history, his use of a fake green card nonetheless placed him in direct violation of U.S. immigration laws.
Legislative Changes: The Laken Riley Act
Laken Riley’s murder and the subsequent deportation proceedings of the Ibarra brothers inspired a political wave that culminated in the passage of the Laken Riley Act. Signed into law in early 2025 by President Donald Trump, this legislation focused on bolstering immigration enforcement and holding undocumented immigrants accountable for certain crimes.
Key provisions of the act gave federal authorities expanded powers to detain and deport undocumented individuals who commit offenses like theft or assault—even before court cases are resolved. Furthermore, the law empowered state attorneys general to sue the federal government for insufficient immigration enforcement within their states. Supporters of the act highlighted its role in safeguarding communities from violent offenders, citing cases like Riley’s as proof of the stakes involved.
However, this controversial law has faced backlash from civil rights organizations, which argue that its implementation could disproportionately affect innocent immigrants or those seeking asylum. Despite criticisms, the legislation marked a turning point in how immigration laws are applied to undocumented immigrants with criminal charges, leading to increased detentions by ICE.
The Wider Impact on Immigration Policy
Diego and Argenis’s deportations spotlight the interconnected issues of illegal entry, fraudulent documentation, and crime. Their cases reflect a growing dilemma for policymakers trying to strike a balance between public safety and equitable treatment of undocumented individuals. Concerns over their forged green cards add to debates about the prevalence of such counterfeit documents and the potential national security risks they pose.
For law enforcement, tracking down immigrants with false documents remains resource-intensive. The Ibarra brothers evaded detection for months, highlighting gaps in existing border security and monitoring. These events further intensified calls for reforms, including stronger identification verification processes and better tracking of individuals released under programs like ATD.
Humanitarian and Legal Concerns
While Diego’s criminal history and gang affiliation drew wider condemnation, Argenis’s case introduces complexities that cannot be ignored. Critics of the Laken Riley Act argue that deporting individuals based solely on possession of fake documents, without a history of violence or other criminal activities, may be unjust. The system’s blunt approach sometimes fails to account for personal motivations, such as desperation, fear, or limited knowledge of immigration laws.
Organizations advocating for immigration reform emphasize that many undocumented immigrants resort to forged documents not to commit crimes but to secure employment or basic public services. Unlike Diego, whose actions reflected a pattern of unlawful behavior, Argenis’s lighter sentence and lack of significant criminal ties show a less clear-cut case for deportation.
Conclusion
The tragic events surrounding Laken Riley’s murder and the legal fallout involving the Ibarra brothers serve as a sobering reminder of the complexities within U.S. immigration and criminal justice systems. While Riley’s convicted murderer, Jose Antonio Ibarra, will spend his life in prison, Diego and Argenis’s fates serve as cautionary tales of the consequences tied to illegal immigration and fraudulent documentation.
Diego’s extensive criminal record and connections to organized crime justified his sentence and eventual deportation, while Argenis’s case underscores the harsher realities even non-violent offenders face under stricter immigration laws. Their arrests reignited questions regarding gaps in border security, the risks of fraudulent green cards, and the ethical implications of mass deportations.
As policymakers and law enforcement agencies grapple with these ongoing challenges, cases like the Ibarras will remain pivotal in discussions shaping future immigration reforms. More information on the deportation and removal processes can be found on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official website. Additionally, as reported by VisaVerge.com, cases of fraudulent green cards frequently highlight the balancing act between national security interests and individual circumstances, underscoring the need for more comprehensive reforms to respond to such crises effectively.
Learn Today
Fraudulent Documentation → Fake or forged documents, like green cards, often used to bypass legal restrictions or obtain unauthorized benefits.
Deportation → The formal removal of a non-citizen from a country for violating immigration laws or committing certain crimes.
Alternatives to Detention (ATD) → A program allowing immigrants to remain free under conditions like electronic monitoring, instead of being detained.
Organized Crime → Criminal activities systematically carried out by groups, often involving illegal enterprises like smuggling, fraud, or gang violence.
Green Card → A permit granting a foreign national authorization to live and work permanently in the United States.
This Article in a Nutshell
The tragic murder of Laken Riley exposed critical flaws in immigration enforcement. Beyond her killer’s conviction, the deportation of his brothers for using fake green cards highlights systemic issues with border security and undocumented crime. Their cases reignite debates on balancing public safety with humane immigration policies, urging reforms to address these challenges.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Brown University Warns International Students, Staff After Professor Deported
• ICE: Many Alleged Gang Members Deported Had No U.S. Criminal Records
• Families Say Deported Relatives Were Wrongly Labeled as Gang Members
• Digvijaysinh Chauhan and accomplice to be deported after $50k fraud in PA
• Another US Flight of Deported Immigrants to Arrive in Pakistan Next Week