Key Takeaways
• Judge Kathleen Williams blocked Florida’s SB 4-C, halting arrests of undocumented immigrants under this law.
• Despite the court order, at least fifteen arrests, including a U.S. citizen, occurred before Attorney General enforced compliance.
• Next hearing on April 29, 2025, will determine if the restraining order against SB 4-C remains in effect longer.
Florida 🇺🇸 has stopped arrests of undocumented immigrants under its recent state immigration law, after a federal judge accused the state of ignoring her court order. This sharp turn comes as a big moment in the debate over who has the right to handle immigration—the federal government or states like Florida 🇺🇸. Senate Bill 4-C (SB 4-C) is at the center of this legal fight, drawing harsh opinions from both sides. The pause in arrests, because of Judge Kathleen Williams’ ruling, is raising questions that affect immigrants, law enforcement, local leaders, and everyday Floridians.
Senate Bill 4-C: What Is It and Why Is It Important?

In February 2025, the Florida 🇺🇸 state legislature passed Senate Bill 4-C. This law made it a crime—specifically, a felony—for certain undocumented immigrants to enter or come back to Florida 🇺🇸. It also required these immigrants to be jailed right away and not given a chance to get out on bond. State leaders said these rules were needed to “protect the public” and to deal with worries about immigration in the state.
But from the start, SB 4-C caused protests and lawsuits. Immigrant rights groups argued that only the federal government—not states—can make and enforce immigration rules because of something in the U.S. Constitution called the Supremacy Clause. This clause says that federal law is more powerful than state law when the two disagree.
Legal Fight Begins: Judge Kathleen Williams Steps In
Just a few weeks after SB 4-C became law, immigrant advocates took the state of Florida 🇺🇸 to court. They claimed the new law was both harsh and illegal. On April 4, 2025, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams agreed to block the law—at least for now—using something called a temporary restraining order (TRO). A TRO is a court order that blocks a new rule or action for a short time, usually until a bigger hearing can be held.
Judge Kathleen Williams explained that she believed the people suing the state (the plaintiffs) would probably be able to show that SB 4-C was unconstitutional. She also said that, if the law stayed in place, it could cause “irreparable harm.” This refers to damage that can’t easily be undone.
As a result of her order, all arrests and other actions under SB 4-C were supposed to stop. She scheduled a new hearing for April 18, to decide if the block would stay in place longer, as the legal case continues.
State Defies the Court: Arrests Continue Despite the Block
However, what happened next surprised many. Even after Judge Kathleen Williams told the state to stop, reports showed that police in Florida 🇺🇸 kept making arrests under SB 4-C. At least fifteen arrests were made, news outlets reported. In one case, the Florida Highway Patrol even arrested someone who turned out to be a U.S. citizen.
These arrests caught the judge’s attention at the next court hearing. Judge Kathleen Williams sounded frustrated and upset:
“When I issued the temporary restraining order, it never occurred to me that police officers would not be bound by it… It never occurred to me that the state attorneys would not give direction to law enforcement so that we would not have these unfortunate arrests.”
Basically, she was saying that she never guessed police would ignore her court order, or that state lawyers wouldn’t tell officers the rules had changed.
Her words were a moment of strong criticism for Florida 🇺🇸 leaders and police, who now faced even more pressure from the public and the media.
Attorney General James Uthmeier Steps In: Orders Compliance
With the court’s anger and public worry growing, Florida 🇺🇸 Attorney General James Uthmeier took action. He told all police departments, sheriffs’ offices, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and the state highway patrol to stop making arrests under SB 4-C.
He made it clear that the judge’s order was the law, and everyone must follow it while the pause (or injunction) remained in place. This direction from the state’s top lawyer was aimed at making sure no more people would be arrested under the blocked law. Analysis from VisaVerge.com suggests that this decision came after strong criticism and legal pushback, and Uthmeier’s letter is being seen as a way to make sure Florida 🇺🇸 does not face even more trouble in court.
Tensions Over Who Makes Immigration Law: State vs. Federal Power
One big issue at the heart of this case is who should be in charge of immigration—the federal government or the states. Florida 🇺🇸 officials have argued in court that their local law officers might not have to obey every federal court order. But Judge Kathleen Williams and immigrant advocates disagree, saying that only the federal government can make and enforce rules about immigrants coming into, or returning to, the United States 🇺🇸.
The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution is central to this debate. It says that when state and federal laws disagree, federal law is stronger. This is why the judge’s order telling Florida 🇺🇸 to pause arrests is so important.
This legal battle is about Senate Bill 4-C, but it also speaks to questions that affect many states and people all over the country. If Florida 🇺🇸 is allowed to make and enforce its own immigration laws, could other states do the same? Would this create a patchwork of rules that make it hard for people to move, work, or travel between states?
Immediate Effects of Judge Kathleen Williams’ Order
With the Attorney General’s new instructions, all law enforcement groups in Florida 🇺🇸 have now been told in plain language to stop using SB 4-C. This halt is seen by immigrant advocates as a major victory, at least for now, in protecting the idea that only the federal government can make immigration law.
For the people affected by the law, including both immigrants and citizens, this pause means they don’t have to worry about being wrongly arrested while the legal fight continues. It also gives a break to police, since they don’t have to enforce a law that is under a legal cloud.
For employers, schools, and local groups, the pause means they can keep serving all their community members without worrying about state arrests under SB 4-C.
Looking Deeper: What Are the Larger Issues?
This fight over SB 4-C is not just about one law or one state. Here are some of the larger questions involved:
- Federal vs. State Control: Only the federal government can set rules about who can enter or stay in the United States 🇺🇸. When states try to do this on their own, courts often step in.
- Police Power: When local police are told to enforce laws that might not be legal, this can hurt trust between officers and the people in their communities.
- Potential for Wrongful Arrests: The fact that a U.S. citizen was mistakenly arrested under SB 4-C shows the real risk that comes with unclear or rushed enforcement.
- Impact on Everyday Life: For many families and workers, the threat of arrest—even just for traveling through Florida 🇺🇸—can mean fear and confusion.
Timeline of Key Events
To help make sense of how things have changed so quickly, here is a summary of what happened:
- February 2025: The Florida 🇺🇸 Legislature passes Senate Bill 4-C, making it a felony for certain undocumented immigrants to enter or come back into Florida 🇺🇸.
- April 4, 2025: Judge Kathleen Williams gives a temporary restraining order, halting all arrests and enforcement of the new law.
- Early April: Despite the order, at least fifteen people are arrested under SB 4-C. Reports include the wrongful arrest of a U.S. citizen.
- Mid-April: Judge Kathleen Williams extends the court’s block on the law through April 29, after learning about ongoing arrests and strong public outcry.
- Around April 19, 2025: Attorney General James Uthmeier orders all statewide agencies to follow the judge’s ruling and stop arrests under SB 4-C.
Possible Outcomes and What’s Next
Judge Kathleen Williams’ pause on SB 4-C is not permanent—at least not yet. The judge set another hearing for April 29, 2025. At that hearing, she will decide whether the block should stay in place while the bigger case is argued in court. If the block is extended, the law will not be enforced for even longer, and immigrants will not face arrest under this rule until the final result is known.
Some lawmakers and courts might say that states should have the right to step in if they think the federal government is not doing enough on immigration. But for now, courts have mostly said this is not allowed.
On the other side, immigrant rights groups see this pause as a “critical victory” against what they call an “unconstitutional attempt by states to usurp federal authority.” That means they believe states should not take actions that are supposed to be left to Congress and federal agencies.
Impacts for Florida and Beyond
The block of SB 4-C sends a strong message well beyond Florida 🇺🇸:
- For Immigrants: Families and workers who might have been afraid of being arrested under SB 4-C can move about more freely, at least for now.
- For Law Enforcement: Police and state troopers have clear rules to follow and do not risk making illegal arrests.
- For Employers and Schools: They do not have to change policies or report on the status of workers or students due to SB 4-C right now.
- For Lawmakers: The legal fight may shape how future laws are written—not only in Florida 🇺🇸, but in other states that might want to make similar laws.
Debate Over the Role of States in Immigration
This legal fight in Florida 🇺🇸 reflects a deeper debate happening across the United States 🇺🇸. Some states have passed laws to increase their role in immigration enforcement, often saying they are responding to local needs or security fears. However, these efforts often end up in court, where judges must decide if they cross the line set by the U.S. Constitution.
In this case, Judge Kathleen Williams’ clear and strong reaction, and the fact that law enforcement still tried to enforce the law after her order, underline just how serious this debate has become.
The Value of Judicial Oversight
This situation has also shown why courts matter. The legal system can act quickly to stop laws that may not be allowed. In this case, the court helped prevent what advocates saw as “irreparable harm,” and made sure people—including U.S. citizens—would not be arrested by mistake.
Future Hearings and Ongoing Litigation
Everything about SB 4-C is now on hold until after the April 29 hearing. At that time, the court will hear new arguments and decide if the restraining order should stay in place even longer.
For those interested in following the updates, reliable information can be found directly at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, which posts orders and schedules for important cases like this.
Summary and What It Means for You
Here’s what readers should remember:
- Senate Bill 4-C in Florida 🇺🇸 made it a felony for some undocumented immigrants to travel into or re-enter the state and forced arrests with no chance for release.
- Federal court, under Judge Kathleen Williams, blocked the law because it seemed unconstitutional and caused real harm.
- Despite the block, police continued to make SB 4-C arrests—including of a U.S. citizen—until the Attorney General ordered a total stop.
- For now, SB 4-C cannot be used while the courts decide if it will be blocked for good.
- This case is important for everyone—immigrants, law enforcement, and those interested in how state and federal powers work when it comes to immigration.
Lawyers, immigrant families, and many state leaders across the country are watching to see what happens next. The final decision may shape how states and the federal government share responsibilities for immigration, not only in Florida 🇺🇸 but in the whole United States 🇺🇸.
For more deep stories about immigration policies, legal disputes, and your rights as an immigrant or citizen, VisaVerge.com remains a trusted source.
As this story develops, keeping aware and understanding your rights is key. Stay connected to official government sources and trusted news for updates, especially if you live, work, or travel in Florida 🇺🇸.
Learn Today
Senate Bill 4-C → Florida law criminalizing undocumented immigrants entering or re-entering the state, central to the recent legal fight.
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) → A short-term court order pausing enforcement of a law or action until further judicial review occurs.
Supremacy Clause → A section of the U.S. Constitution establishing that federal law takes precedence over conflicting state laws.
Injunction → A court order requiring a party to do or cease doing specific acts, often halting law enforcement.
Attorney General → The chief legal officer of a state, responsible for enforcing state laws and implementing court orders.
This Article in a Nutshell
Florida’s enforcement of Senate Bill 4-C, criminalizing undocumented immigrants’ entry, stopped after Judge Kathleen Williams’ court order. Continued arrests triggered public outrage and federal criticism. Attorney General Uthmeier ordered compliance with the court’s block. The case highlights federal versus state control debates and has nationwide immigration implications ahead of an April hearing.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Florida Universities join ICE in campus immigration enforcement program
• Pope Francis shapes global conversation on immigration and migrants
• Fordham University forms Immigration Task Force after visa cancellations
• Religious Worker Visa Program faces new limits under US Immigration Changes
• Immigration crackdown complicates bird flu control among farmworkers
Illegal immigrants rights are not found in the Constitution. This includes Due Process. Illegals entering the USA is an act of aggression. If they wore a uniform would we ask the Court to give them a hearing before we push them out of our Country. These judges are incompetent and political hacks. This is going to lead to no one following the Law. The Left wants civil unrest and they will probably get their wish.