Key Takeaways
• Over 900,000 migrants using CBP One face deportation orders effective April 8, 2025, under Trump administration.
• CBP Home app replaces CBP One to facilitate self-deportation and enforce stricter immigration policies.
• Daily fines of up to $998 imposed on migrants failing to comply with deportation orders.
The U.S. immigration system has taken a sharp turn with the Trump administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoking the legal status of migrants who entered the country using the CBP One app. This groundbreaking app, introduced during the Biden administration, provided migrants with a legal way to schedule appointments at U.S. borders, granting temporary two-year stays to over 900,000 individuals since January 2023. As of April 8, 2025, those migrants face immediate orders to leave the U.S. This marks a significant reversal of policy, dismantling a program that aimed to address migration through structured, humane processes. It also signals a reinstatement of stricter immigration rules and enforcement under the Trump administration.
This decision not only ends the CBP One app’s use but also introduces a replacement: the CBP Home app, a new tool designed to facilitate voluntary self-deportation. The consequences of this pivotal move ripple through communities, families, and the broader immigration system, highlighting the complexities of immigration reform under differing political ideologies.
What Was the CBP One App and Why Was It Introduced?
Launched during the Biden administration, the CBP One app was designed to create a safer, more orderly process for migrants arriving at the southern border. The app helped asylum seekers and other eligible individuals avoid dangerous, illegal crossings into the U.S. by allowing them to claim a scheduled border processing time through an official and legal pathway. Its target audience included migrants fleeing violence, political instability, or extreme poverty, primarily from Latin America.
The app also provided a temporary legal status, or parole, enabling migrants to live and work legally in the U.S. for two years until further steps in their application process. By doing so, CBP One reduced pressure at border facilities while maintaining border security. It allowed the immigration system to function with fewer surprises, as migrants were more likely to comply with established procedures.
Despite its intended benefits, the app faced fierce criticism. Political opponents, including members of the Trump administration, viewed the CBP One program as a weak immigration strategy. Many also argued that it bypassed the proper asylum process, calling it an abuse of parole authority. These criticisms set the stage for the recent revocation of legal status and the dismantling of the program.
Why Was Legal Status Revoked?
The Trump administration justified this policy shift by asserting a need to restore control at the border and uphold security measures. Officials in DHS argued that the Biden administration overextended its authority by using the parole process to admit such a large volume of migrants without thorough screenings. According to them, the CBP One app created loopholes by allowing individuals who might not qualify for asylum to gain legal status.
Additionally, DHS officials referred to the program as a “catch and release” policy in disguise. They claimed it enabled vast numbers of migrants to enter and remain in the U.S. despite questionable eligibility for permanent legal residency or asylum. As part of its broader rollback of Biden-era immigration strategies, the administration terminated this program to return to a stricter immigration enforcement approach.
Introducing CBP Home: A New Direction
In place of the CBP One app, the Trump administration unveiled the CBP Home app. Unlike its predecessor, CBP Home was not created to manage migrant intake but to encourage undocumented individuals to self-deport. The app prompts users to input personal details, such as travel plans, and guides them through the deportation process.
While officials describe this transition as a cost-effective way to improve compliance with deportation orders, critics have a different view. They believe the app only serves to enforce harsh self-deportation policies under the guise of voluntary participation. Others fear that the app could expose users’ private data to future deportation and surveillance efforts. Moreover, penalties tied to non-compliance with deportation orders have heightened concerns about fairness and justice.
Heavy Financial Penalties for Non-Compliance
Alongside the legal status revocation, DHS has reinforced deportation orders with steep fines. Migrants who fail to meet deadlines for leaving the U.S. face daily fines of up to $998. These penalties, authorized by immigration law since 1996, could be applied retroactively, leading some individuals to accumulate fines as high as $1 million. For families already struggling financially, these devastating fines are seen by immigration advocates as excessive.
The fines also extend beyond just monetary consequences. In cases of non-payment, the government has the authority to seize assets, which could affect U.S. citizen children in mixed-status households — households where some family members are undocumented while others are lawful residents or citizens. Critics warn these measures are not only punitive but also risk tearing families apart and harming the very fabric of stable migrant communities.
Pushback From Legal and Advocacy Groups
The Trump administration’s rigid approach has sparked legal battles, casting doubt on its long-term viability. For example, federal courts recently blocked fast-tracked deportations to third countries, a tactic that some argued violated necessary legal procedures and obligations under international agreements, such as the Convention Against Torture.
Advocacy groups, too, argue the revocation of CBP One parolees’ rights conflicts with due process. Despite using government-sanctioned programs to enter the U.S. legally, affected individuals now face abrupt deportations without the chance for individualized case reviews. Activists claim such reversals undermine trust in the immigration system and use fear to promote compliance.
Human Costs of the Policy Shift
The emotional and social toll of these policy changes is impossible to ignore. Migrants who embraced the CBP One app believed they were following the rules. Now, they face immense uncertainty. Families who have lived and worked in the U.S. for years may be forced to uproot their lives. Those with U.S.-born children are at risk of separation, as deportation orders could send parents away while children remain citizens.
Meanwhile, communities that have integrated these migrants, including employers relying on migrant labor, are likely to suffer economic disruptions. This sudden shift undermines local economies while threatening the stability of family units.
Long-Term Impacts on Immigration Policy
Replacing humane systems like CBP One with aggressive policies may have unintended consequences. Instead of decreasing migration numbers, stricter measures could increase desperation, driving more people to attempt dangerous crossings. By removing a safe and legal option, the administration risks creating heightened border chaos.
Moreover, this policy change could strain U.S.-Mexico relations and provoke backlash from neighboring countries. Mexico is likely to bear the brunt of new migration pressures as individuals turned away from the U.S. await new pathways to legal status. Such consequences highlight the challenges of substituting humanitarian programs with enforcement-heavy tactics.
Conclusion
The revocation of legal status for migrants using the CBP One app represents a stark shift in U.S. immigration policy. What began as an effort to create lawful, organized pathways under the Biden administration has now become a tale of uncertainty, penalties, and hardship under Trump’s renewed focus on enforcement. For affected migrants — individuals who followed the rules to build a life of stability — this shift is more than a policy change. It is a profound disruption, with social, economic, and personal consequences that will likely reverberate for years.
While CBP Home symbolizes a pivot to harsher measures, it raises pressing concerns about fairness, human rights, and the future of immigration reform. Whether these measures achieve greater border control or lead to unintended chaos remains an unfolding question. Meanwhile, communities across the U.S. brace for the impacts on their jobs, neighborhoods, and futures, as VisaVerge.com and other analysts closely monitor the situation. For now, both the judiciary and public opinion will play critical roles in shaping what comes next.
Learn Today
CBP One → An app enabling legal migrant appointments and temporary U.S. entry, introduced during Biden’s administration.
CBP Home → A new app designed by the Trump administration to facilitate voluntary self-deportation processes for undocumented migrants.
Parole Authority → A legal provision allowing temporary entry into the U.S. for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
Deportation Orders → Legal directives requiring individuals to leave the country due to immigration law violations.
Catch and Release → A term used to describe temporary release of immigrants while awaiting immigration hearings, criticized for perceived leniency.
This Article in a Nutshell
The Trump administration revoked legal status for 900,000 CBP One users, effective April 8, 2025. CBP Home replaces the app, enforcing self-deportation. Heavy fines of $998 per day target noncompliance, impacting families economically and socially. Immigrant advocates warn these changes are punitive and risk separating families, pressuring communities further.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Asian immigrants rally over delays in residence permits in Lisbon
• DHS tells 531,000 paroled immigrants under Biden to leave the US
• Hundreds of Migrants Detained at John F. Kennedy Airport
• Latin American Migrants Sending More Money Home Than Ever
• Trump Administration Plans to Use Controversial Florida Facility for Migrants
