Judge Halts Deportation of Palestinian Activist Held at Columbia University

Key Takeaways

• Judge Jesse Furman issued a March 10, 2025, order halting Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation pending further immigration court proceedings.
• ICE detained Khalil on March 8, alleging a revoked student visa, despite his valid green card, later reportedly canceled by agents.
• A legal conference on March 13, 2025, will address allegations linking Khalil’s activism to Hamas and his residency status challenges.

A federal judge has temporarily stopped the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and graduate student who became a central figure during anti-Israel protests held at Columbia University 🇺🇸 in spring 2024. On March 10, 2025, Judge Jesse Furman issued an order halting Khalil’s removal from the United States pending court proceedings. The case has gained widespread attention, sparking debate on topics like free speech, immigration, and the rights of campus activists.

Arrest and Initial Legal Issues

Khalil’s arrest unfolded quickly on March 8, 2025, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained him at his university-owned apartment near Columbia University’s Manhattan campus 🇺🇸. According to his attorney, Amy Greer, the agents justified the arrest by stating that Khalil’s student visa had been revoked by the State Department. Khalil, however, had already been granted permanent residency with a green card, which means he no longer required a student visa to live in the United States. Despite this, the agents reportedly claimed they were also canceling his green card status.

This arrest is seen to align with President Trump’s stricter immigration measures. The Trump administration had earlier pledged to target international students who participated in protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza, claiming such actions supported Hamas, a group officially designated by the United States as a terrorist organization.

Khalil’s arrest and subsequent transfer to an immigration detention facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and later to Jena, Louisiana, highlight the severity with which immigration authorities are treating the case. Khalil now faces court proceedings that could lead to his deportation.

Judge’s Emergency Ruling

The legal intervention from Judge Furman represents a significant moment in Khalil’s case. The emergency order explicitly forbids the Trump administration from taking steps to deport Khalil until further notice. Furthermore, Judge Furman called for a legal conference scheduled for March 13, 2025, where attorneys representing both the Trump administration and Khalil will present their arguments. Furman’s order emphasized that Khalil would remain in the U.S. until the judiciary issues another formal ruling.

Khalil’s transfer to Jena, Louisiana—a far cry from his life as a graduate student in Manhattan—demonstrates the heightened measures taken in his case. Such measures have amplified questions about the balancing of national security concerns, immigration policy, and individual rights.

Legal Complexities Surrounding the Case

This case highlights the potential legal vulnerabilities faced by green card holders. Permanent residents, even with a green card, can face deportation if accused of certain crimes or if associated with organizations designated as terrorist groups. However, removing someone’s residency is a serious legal step that requires a ruling from an immigration judge. Statements from Camille Mackler, founder of Immigrant ARC, pointed out that the final judgment would depend on how the immigration court interprets allegations of Khalil’s purported support of Hamas through activism or speech. Specifically, the allegations could serve as grounds for revocation of his green card.

However, many legal experts and advocates argue that Khalil’s arrest raises troubling questions about retaliation for political views. Critics have suggested that targeting Khalil, who protested U.S. policy and Israeli actions, may reflect an effort by the Trump administration to suppress voices critical of its stance on Israel. This has amplified concerns about using immigration enforcement to punish campus activism and speech.

Columbia University’s Role in the Case

Khalil’s association with Columbia University 🇺🇸 adds another layer to the controversy. Columbia has been under scrutiny from the Trump administration over claims that it hasn’t adequately addressed antisemitism on its campus. As part of broader tensions, the federal government recently announced a $400 million reduction in grants and contracts to the university, asserting that such measures were necessary to address what the administration saw as permissive attitudes toward antisemitic incidents.

Columbia University’s internal handling of activism has also drawn attention. A newly established office at the university is investigating Khalil and other students. Khalil alone faces 13 disciplinary allegations, largely related to social media posts, which he contends were not published by him.

Despite mounting questions about Khalil’s arrest and detention, Columbia University has largely remained silent. The university confirmed that law enforcement officers must present a warrant to operate on university property but made no comment regarding the production of a warrant in Khalil’s specific case. This neutrality has frustrated some members of the student body, who have called for more robust institutional support for Khalil and similar activists.

A Broader Public Reaction

Khalil’s arrest has mobilized substantial public backlash. Protests held in Manhattan 🇺🇸 on March 10, 2025, saw a mix of activists, students, and advocates voicing outrage at Khalil’s detention. Demonstrators carried signs supporting free speech and denouncing the use of immigration law to silence campus activism.

These protests underscore a larger struggle over the role of activism in academic spaces, with particular attention on how protests are treated when challenging political orthodoxies. Khalil’s defenders argue that associating peaceful protest with terrorism marks a dangerous expansion of immigration enforcement powers.

President Trump’s Policy Approach

In stark contrast to the protests, President Donald Trump has defended the actions against Khalil as part of a broader campaign to combat what he views as harmful campus activism. Trump called Khalil’s case a “starting point” and warned that similar actions could follow against students involved in pro-Palestinian protests. This policy direction suggests the administration’s willingness to use immigration law as a tool to manage dissenting views on sensitive political matters such as U.S.-Israel relations.

Khalil’s predicament illustrates the contours of this strategy, as the administration insists that activists supporting groups like Hamas, even indirectly, forfeit their right to remain in the United States.

Future Impact of Khalil’s Case

The implications of Mahmoud Khalil’s case extend beyond him. It raises important questions about the rights of permanent residents, the powers of immigration authorities, and the importance of safeguarding free expression in academic institutions. Several legal and social issues arise:

• Can a green card holder lose permanent residency due to peaceful activism?
• To what extent is critical political expression protected for non-citizens?
• Should universities take a more active role in shielding students from government actions like Khalil’s arrest?

As legal proceedings escalate, Khalil’s future and the broader legal precedents set by his case will be closely observed. The March 13 conference will mark a pivotal moment for the case, offering potential signals about how courts approach complex intersections of national security and civil liberties.

Conclusion

The deportation case against Mahmoud Khalil brings into focus the uneasy balance between protecting national security and defending individual rights in the United States. Khalil’s position as a permanent resident, activist, and student situates his case at the crossroads of these critical issues. Judge Furman’s intervention against immediate deportation creates a pause, but the case’s resolution will likely shape the experience of international students and activists for years to come.

Columbia University’s role as a significant backdrop in this case has further underscored the growing tension between higher education institutions and the federal government. As the discussion continues, stakeholders from universities, civil rights groups, and policymakers may feel increasing pressure to address the broader implications for free speech, immigration law, and campus activism.

For those following Khalil’s case, reliable updates can be found through various platforms, including VisaVerge.com, which provides deeper analysis of immigration trends and cases. To learn more about your rights as a green card holder, visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ official green card information page at USCIS Green Card Information.

Learn Today

Deportation → The forced removal of a non-citizen from a country, typically due to violations of immigration laws or policies.
Green Card → A document granting lawful permanent residency in the U.S., allowing work, study, and indefinite stay, unless revoked.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws and managing detention and deportation systems in the U.S.
Immigration Judge → A legal official authorized to determine cases involving the removal, detention, or adjustment of status of non-citizens.
Permanent Residency → A legal status allowing a foreign citizen to live and work indefinitely in a different country without gaining citizenship.

This Article in a Nutshell

A federal judge has paused Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation, spotlighting the clash between free speech and immigration policy. Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia graduate, was detained despite holding a green card. Critics argue his arrest demonstrates retaliation against political dissent, sparking nationwide debates on civil liberties, campus activism, and U.S. immigration enforcement.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Activists Detained at U.S. Embassy While Seeking Visa for Damir Ortiz Ramírez
• San Diego Activists Form Community Patrols to Protect Immigrant Families
• ‘Know Your Rights’: Activists Stress Protections for All, Regardless of Status
• Trump Advices Schools to Report Activist Students for Deportation
• Climate Activist Zain Haq Facing Deportation from Canada