USCIS Proposes Collecting Social Media Handles on Immigration Forms

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

• USCIS proposes collecting Social Media Identifiers on specific immigration forms to enhance vetting, following Executive Order 14161’s directives.
• Affected forms include N-400, I-485, and others; around 3.6 million applicants annually may spend 5 minutes completing this.
• Public comments on privacy, utility, and methodology are invited during a 60-day feedback period via the Federal eRulemaking Portal.

The Department of Homeland Security, through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has proposed an important new step in its immigration processes by introducing the collection of Social Media Identifiers on particular immigration forms. This initiative, which stems from Executive Order 14161, titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats,” aims to strengthen national security by ensuring a comprehensive vetting system. The proposal was published in the Federal Register for public comment, consistent with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, initiating a 60-day period for feedback. The public is invited to provide input on various aspects of this proposed information collection.

The Need for Enhanced Screening Standards

USCIS Proposes Collecting Social Media Handles on Immigration Forms

Executive Order 14161, published in January 2025, emphasizes the necessity for rigorous and uniform standards in vetting and screening immigrants. The directive requires federal agencies to incorporate all relevant tools and data sources to assess eligibility for immigration-related benefits. Specifically, it tasks USCIS with gathering and analyzing Social Media Identifiers—commonly referred to as social media “handles”—to enhance identity verification procedures and provide a more detailed understanding of applicants’ backgrounds when evaluating security or public safety risks.

This move reflects a growing recognition of the role social media can play in revealing critical information about individuals, particularly in assessing risks related to terrorism or other security concerns. In recent years, the absence of social media-related data was perceived as a gap in the otherwise extensive vetting processes conducted by U.S. immigration authorities. For example, Social Media Identifiers may potentially verify identity authenticity or highlight patterns that raise national security flags. This change acknowledges this evolving digital dynamic while alleging to tread carefully to avoid undue privacy infringements.

This data will be gathered for specific immigration benefits applications and will be included in USCIS’s identity confirmation, screening, vetting, and inspections. Nevertheless, key questions surrounding the balancing of national security interests and individual privacy rights have already emerged in initial public discourse.

Details of the Information Collection Process

USCIS proposes implementing this information collection under “Generic Clearance for the Collection of Social Media Identifier(s) on Immigration Forms” (OMB Control Number 1615-New), which includes the following features:

Data Sources: USCIS plans to ask applicants to provide their Social Media Identifiers, alongside the corresponding platform names. This would apply to applicants of specific immigration benefits. However, USCIS has not disclosed whether there will be a definitive list of platforms or whether applicants will need to report identifiers across all platforms they use.
Targeted Forms: Several immigration forms, including popular ones, will incorporate these additional fields. For instance, the N-400 form for naturalization applicants and the I-485 form for those registering permanent residence or adjusting their status will feature questions related to Social Media Identifiers. The proposed collection instruments are also expected to apply to other forms such as I-131, I-589, and I-730, among others.
Scope of Respondents: The initiative will focus only on certain populations, targeting cases where sufficient grounds for enhanced scrutiny exist. Applicants from high-risk categories or whose applications raise red flags may more frequently find themselves required to provide this data. The public is invited to share feedback on the scope of targeted individuals.
Estimated Impacts on Public: According to USCIS estimates, nearly 3.6 million individuals across various immigration benefits applications annually would be affected by this new requirement. The estimated average time burden for applicants to provide their information is minimal—just under five minutes (0.08 hours) per applicant. The data collection will not impose any direct additional costs on applicants, as any associated expenses are already accounted for in the overall application process.

Implications for Applicants and Agencies

The proposed implementation of collecting Social Media Identifiers carries potential benefits and challenges, both for immigration officials and applicants.

For Applicants: While the initiative aims to serve broader security objectives, applicants may experience a greater sense of scrutiny, particularly over their digital activity. Violations of privacy are a major concern for advocacy groups and applicants. Some fear that misunderstandings or discretionary decisions based on social media posts could negatively impact their application outcome. Importantly, USCIS notes that this data will strictly support existing identity and security screening protocols without becoming the sole basis for application denials.
For USCIS: On the agency’s end, the addition of this information may streamline security screenings and assist immigration adjudicators in better identifying potential fraud or misrepresentation during the vetting process. For example, non-matching or suspicious online activity could complement other warning signs prompting additional investigation. However, the agency will need robust mechanisms to ensure the data is reviewed accurately and objectively, avoiding any risk of bias or profiling.

Concerns and Public Feedback

As the mechanism for introducing this new information collection undergoes public comment, several key questions have risen:

Practical Utility: Public commentary is expected to assess whether adding Social Media Identifiers will truly enhance USCIS’s ability to fulfill executive directives on national security. Some critics argue the marginal benefits might not outweigh the potential administrative burden or risk.
Privacy and Oversight: The proposal advises limiting personal information submitted in the voluntary public comment phase, cautioning that all comments will appear publicly. This reflects sensitivity around privacy, echoing broader concerns about how USCIS will store, access, and use applicants’ sensitive online data.
Methodologies: USCIS invites evaluation of its proposed burden estimates. For example, while five minutes per applicant seems minimal, multiply this by nearly four million applicants annually, and significant operational changes may be required. Public responses from experts in technology or information management are anticipated to weigh in on efficiency considerations.
Clarifying Ambiguities: Questions also remain about the limits of this collection—such as whether applicants who do not use social media can skip the requirement without penalty, or whether the collected data can be misinterpreted.

Legal Context Moving Forward

As this collection requirement progresses, sustained debate on its alignment with legal and ethical norms will likely continue. The prospect of legal challenges, particularly by privacy-focused organizations, cannot be ignored. Public concerns suggested in the coming months might push regulators to implement safeguards or adjust procedures.

Addressing Public Queries

Among the questions commonly raised are:

Will applicants in high-risk categories face stricter assessments due to mandatory submissions?
Will the absence of a Social Media Identifier on a form, for applicants who do not use social media, adversely impact their eligibility?
How can applicants verify data accuracy or challenge discrepancies during screening?
Will individuals whose applications are denied based on data submitted through this mechanism be transparently notified and offered means of redress?

Public feedback obtained during the 60-day period will help address and clarify such complex parts before implementation. Amendments reflecting public concerns could influence how forms are initially rolled out.

Next Steps and Guidance for Stakeholders

All comments during this phase should address the four outlined focus areas to provide structured feedback. Stakeholders, from applicants to policy experts, are encouraged to submit detailed and constructive responses via the Federal eRulemaking Portal.

Meanwhile, applicants seeking updates regarding their specific case statuses or needing form-specific guidance can access USCIS’s official tools, such as its Case Status Online system. For detailed information about active forms like the N-400 or I-485, further inquiries can be directed to specific USCIS divisions or hotlines.

This shift signals USCIS’s ongoing commitment to adapting to connect broader screening frameworks with digital-era tools, ensuring the delicate balance between vigilance and fairness. For now, Executive Order 14161 remains a strong foundation for developing such proactive national security policies, as addressed in this particular proposal.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, this proposed information collection unfolds amidst a continually evolving landscape of immigration policy, reflecting evolving challenges within modern security dynamics. Applicants are advised to follow updates closely and seek professional advice when necessary to comprehend their specific obligations and rights.

Learn Today

Social Media Identifiers → Information such as usernames or handles used on social media platforms to monitor applicants’ online activity.
Executive Order 14161 → A presidential directive emphasizing enhanced vetting and security standards for immigration processes to protect national safety.
Federal Register → The official journal for U.S. government rules, proposals, and actions, allowing public commentary on proposed regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) → A 1995 U.S. law aimed at minimizing the paperwork burden on individuals and agencies while ensuring efficient data collection.
OMB Control Number → A unique identifier issued by the Office of Management and Budget, assigned to approved data collection processes for tracking purposes.

This Article in a Nutshell

The DHS, via USCIS, proposes collecting Social Media Identifiers on immigration forms under Executive Order 14161. Aimed at enhancing national security, this measure sparks privacy concerns. While it promises stronger screening, critics worry about misuse or bias. Public feedback during a 60-day window will shape the initiative’s final implementation.
— By VisaVerge.com