DHS Seeks to Enlist IRS Agents in Immigration Deportation Efforts

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

On February 11, 2025, DHS formally requested the deputization of IRS agents to support deportation efforts under the Trump administration.
The “Securing Our Border Act” proposes reallocating $22.4 billion in IRS funding to enhance border security infrastructure and deportation processes.
Deputizing IRS agents raises legal issues and may impact their primary tax enforcement duties, requiring specialized training for effective contribution.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has made an extraordinary request to the U.S. Treasury Department for the deputization of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents to support immigration enforcement. On February 11, 2025, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem formally conveyed this request in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, seeking to redirect IRS resources to bolster deportation efforts under the Trump administration. This proposal serves as a key part of the administration’s intensified strategy to carry out what President Trump has described as the largest deportation operation in U.S. history.

The Context of the Request

Secretary Noem’s letter highlighted the DHS’s need to enhance immigration enforcement, specifically mentioning assistance in locating individuals residing unlawfully in the United States and investigating human trafficking networks. Publicly, Noem reinforced this stance on the social media platform X, emphasizing the intent to repurpose IRS resources to benefit taxpayers indirectly. She stated, “Instead of having Biden’s 87,000 IRS agents take more money from Americans, I have requested that they help taxpayers SAVE money by helping ICE round up criminal illegal aliens for deportation.” The statement reflects the administration’s broader strategy of reallocating federal resources toward securing immigration priorities.

DHS Seeks to Enlist IRS Agents in Immigration Deportation Efforts

This initiative arrives amidst a backdrop of changes to both the IRS and immigration enforcement efforts. In recent years, the IRS has experienced an increase in its workforce and budget. DHS views this as an opportunity to address its own resource shortages in carrying out extensive deportation operations. Illegal immigration into the United States has reportedly decreased under the Trump administration; however, the focus has shifted towards deporting individuals who are already inside the country without proper documentation.

Expanded Use of Federal Agencies in Deportation Actions

The request to deputize IRS agents follows a January 2025 memo from Acting Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman. The memo, obtained by the Wall Street Journal, outlined a strategy to involve federal agencies not traditionally associated with immigration enforcement. Agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S. Marshals Service have already been granted deportation powers. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) also holds similar authority but has used it sparingly.

While federal agencies like the DEA and ATF may encounter immigration issues in the course of their regular law enforcement duties, the scale of these agencies’ involvement in deportation efforts is unprecedented. The Trump administration’s approach appears to prioritize a unified federal effort, bringing multiple agencies together to achieve immigration objectives more efficiently.

Legislative Proposals to Redirect IRS Resources

In addition to the DHS’s direct request to the Treasury Department, Congress is pushing for legislative changes to reallocate IRS resources entirely toward border security. The Securing Our Border Act, introduced on February 7, 2025, proposes redirecting unobligated IRS funding to enhance border security infrastructure. Senator Tim Scott, one of the primary sponsors of the bill, estimates that $22.4 billion could be made available through this reallocation. Scott criticized previous policies that expanded IRS funding, stating, “President [Joe] Biden’s ill-advised decision to supercharge the IRS while we had a crisis on our southern border couldn’t have been more out-of-touch or unnecessary.” In sharp contrast, Scott praised the Trump administration’s immediate focus on immigration enforcement since returning to office.

If passed, the Securing Our Border Act would provide a substantial financial boost for immigration enforcement efforts, further expanding the administration’s ability to conduct enforcement and deportation operations. The legislative proposal aligns with the administration’s broader goal to rebuild immigration policies with a strong emphasis on law enforcement.

Practical and Logistical Considerations

The deputization of IRS agents for immigration enforcement raises several significant questions, both operational and legal. First, IRS agents are primarily trained in tax laws and financial investigations. While their expertise could be particularly effective in tracking financial transactions that support human trafficking or smuggling networks, they would need specialized training to contribute to deportation-related operations. There remains uncertainty about the degree of their involvement—whether their role would be limited to investigative support or if they would participate in active enforcement actions such as raids or detentions.

Second, there may be legal hurdles to deputizing IRS agents for deportation tasks. Although DHS can request assistance from other federal agencies, legal frameworks granting such authority must be carefully defined. These actions could face significant court challenges, particularly from advocacy groups or other stakeholders who may argue that such a diversion of duties exceeds the agencies’ lawful mandates.

Additionally, this shift in resources has the potential to disrupt the IRS’s primary mission: the enforcement of tax laws and collection of revenue. Repurposing agents to handle immigration enforcement could affect the agency’s ability to meet its core responsibilities, such as auditing returns and addressing tax fraud. Critics of the administration may raise concerns about the broader implications of redirecting federal agencies from their established duties to address immigration priorities.

Implications for Immigration Policy

The timing of this request and broader administrative actions is notable. Coming just a few weeks into President Trump’s new term, the initiative underscores the administration’s urgency in pursuing immigration policies. This proactive approach reflects a shift in focus from border security measures toward addressing the existing undocumented population within the United States. However, such an ambitious undertaking may intensify public debate about the balance between enforcement priorities and other national concerns, such as the economy and public safety.

The use of IRS agents in deportation efforts would use the agency’s financial investigation capabilities to add depth to immigration enforcement, especially in complex cases like tracking human smuggling operations. However, assigning agents trained in tax law to tasks far outside their expertise raises questions about efficiency and effectiveness. It also highlights the administration’s readiness to involve all available resources, even those far removed from immigration, in its efforts to meet its enforcement goals.

Legal and Policy Challenges

As the DHS awaits a response from the Treasury Department, the legal and procedural aspects of the request remain under scrutiny. The specific process for deputizing federal employees from agencies such as the IRS would likely require robust legal mechanisms. Any implementation would also need to address concerns from employee unions, civil rights organizations, and immigration advocacy groups. Court challenges to the policy could delay implementation or require substantial adjustments.

Furthermore, DHS’s comprehensive approach to immigration enforcement signals significant changes in how deportation efforts are planned and executed. Depending on the scope and scale of interagency cooperation, the involvement of agencies like the DEA, ATF, and IRS could redefine the federal government’s role in immigration matters by embedding enforcement responsibilities across multiple departments.

Looking Ahead

As of now, the Treasury Department has not issued a public response to the DHS’s request. If approved, this initiative would mark a new phase in interagency cooperation for immigration enforcement. It also illustrates the administration’s broader commitment to policies centered on widespread deportation efforts.

The DHS request is part of a larger strategy to prioritize immigration enforcement as a critical government function. Yet, it also underscores tensions between law enforcement and other governmental priorities. The potential redirection of IRS resources has spurred interest among policymakers and the public, with debates likely to escalate in coming weeks over its legality, feasibility, and long-term effects.

For individuals or organizations impacted by these policies, staying informed will be essential. This includes understanding the evolving roles of federal agencies in immigration enforcement and preparing for any foreseeable changes to government operations. For further details on U.S. immigration enforcement laws and policies, the official Department of Homeland Security website provides useful updates: www.dhs.gov.

In conclusion, the DHS proposal to deputize IRS agents signifies a bold attempt to augment deportation capabilities as part of the Trump administration’s intensified immigration strategy. By leveraging resources across multiple federal agencies, DHS aims to fulfill its mission to enforce immigration law more comprehensively. However, this proposal raises critical questions about resource allocation, policy priorities, and the impacts on government functions.

Learn Today

Deputization → Granting authority or power to individuals or groups to perform tasks outside their usual responsibilities, often temporarily.
Immigration Enforcement → Government actions aimed at managing or reducing unauthorized entry or residency in a country.
Human Trafficking → The illegal trade of humans for forced labor, sexual exploitation, or other illicit purposes.
Interagency Cooperation → Collaboration between different government agencies to achieve a shared goal or address complex issues.
Unobligated Funding → Government funds allocated but not yet committed to specific projects or expenses, potentially available for reallocation.

This Article in a Nutshell

The DHS’s request to deputize IRS agents for immigration enforcement marks a bold pivot in U.S. policy, leveraging tax expertise for deportation efforts. While aimed at maximizing federal resources, critics question its legality, efficiency, and impact on core IRS missions. This unprecedented move highlights growing tensions between immigration priorities and government roles.
— By VisaVerge.com