Will Border Security Deals with Canada and Mexico Deliver Real Results to USA?

Dive Right Into

Key Takeaways

• Mexico deployed 10,000 National Guard troops on February 4, 2025, to target immigration, drug smuggling, and firearms trafficking.
• U.S. delayed 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican exports for 30 days, tied to border security measures and further talks.
• Canada appointed a fentanyl czar, labeled Mexican cartels terrorist organizations, and joined the U.S. in combating organized crime.

Recent agreements between the United States 🇺🇸, Canada 🇨🇦, and Mexico 🇲🇽 aim to tighten border security and address urgent immigration concerns. On February 4, 2025, Canada and Mexico struck agreements with the White House to avoid heavy tariffs in exchange for stepping up security measures at their borders. This marked a critical moment in President Donald Trump’s efforts to curb illegal immigration and the flow of fentanyl—an extremely dangerous synthetic drug—into the United States. These initiatives also reflect the administration’s growing reliance on neighboring countries to support its border policy goals.

Agreements Under Pressure

Will Border Security Deals with Canada and Mexico Deliver Real Results to USA?

The deals were reached under threat of imposing 25% tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of Canadian and Mexican exports to the United States. This move created economic urgency for both countries, leading to temporary agreements that defer any tariffs for at least 30 days. During that time, further negotiations will occur to evaluate the success of these measures.

President Trump has consistently emphasized the need for stronger collaboration with neighboring countries to combat illegal immigration and drug smuggling. However, these agreements have not been free of criticism and skepticism, as questions about their long-term effects remain.

Mexico Steps Up Border Security

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced on February 3 that Mexico would deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to key locations along the U.S.-Mexico border. This action began on February 4, with deployments to 18 cities and towns to achieve several objectives:

Prevent illegal immigration into the United States
Stop drug smuggling, particularly fentanyl
Prevent the trafficking of firearms from the United States into Mexico

This commitment from Mexico marks one of the most comprehensive attempts to assist with U.S. border policy. While the deployment targets drug trafficking and immigration, Erin Corcoran, a professor at Notre Dame University, has cautioned that smugglers often adjust their tactics. When borders become harder to cross using traditional routes, smugglers tend to find more dangerous or less-monitored routes. Because of this, the success of such measures in halting the movement of drugs like fentanyl remains uncertain. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, has contributed to a large portion of overdose deaths in the United States, creating a significant crisis.

While the U.S. government views Mexico’s cooperation as a win, there is an underlying tension regarding the “Remain in Mexico” policy. This controversial policy requires asylum-seekers to stay in Mexico while awaiting their U.S. court hearings. Although critical to the Trump administration’s agenda, Mexico’s response has been lukewarm, especially concerning migrants from countries other than Mexico.

Canada’s Role and Reduced Fentanyl Threat

In parallel, Canada announced its agreement a day after Mexico’s, securing a 30-day pause on tariffs to provide time for further coordination. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau outlined several steps his government would undertake:

Appointing a fentanyl czar to lead drug enforcement efforts
Formally designating Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations
Creating a joint U.S.-Canada task force to combat organized crime and disrupt drug and money-laundering operations

Interestingly, many of the actions Canada agreed to were already included in a December 2024 plan. This has led observers to question the actual impact of these “new” steps. Moreover, the fentanyl issue along the northern border is relatively minor compared to the southern border. Of the 21,889 pounds of fentanyl seized by U.S. border authorities in Fiscal Year 2024, only 43 pounds were intercepted at the Canadian border. By comparison, the southern border with Mexico saw over 21,000 pounds seized.

Experts like Erin Corcoran suggest that while there is an increase in smuggling through Canada, these routes remain far less active than those in hot spots like Texas or Arizona. This indicates that Canada’s enhanced measures might be more symbolic and responsive to U.S. political expectations than based on immediate necessity. Still, joint efforts between Canada and the U.S. could strengthen overall anti-smuggling measures.

Ongoing Negotiations

The White House has framed these agreements as victories for border security. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stressed that efforts to control illegal immigration and keep deadly drugs out of the U.S. are top priorities for the Trump administration. However, achieving lasting results will depend heavily on future discussions with Canadian and Mexican officials. Both sides are now preparing for more high-level negotiations expected to occur in the coming weeks. U.S. representatives include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary nominee Howard Lutnick.

Legal and Economic Challenges

While these agreements are aimed at boosting border security, they also raise questions about international trade laws and the potential for economic retaliation. President Trump declared a national border emergency on January 20, 2025, under Proclamation 10886, giving him the authority to impose further tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

However, unilateral U.S. actions may clash with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the trade deal signed in July 2020 to promote fair trade between the three nations. Critics argue that the IEEPA tariffs would go against the terms of USMCA, which explicitly blocks such tariffs except under specific “essential security” circumstances. While U.S. courts often side with the president in such cases, legal challenges could arise, making the future uncertain.

Risks of Retaliation

The fear of economic retaliation weighs heavily in this scenario. Both Canada and Mexico have signaled they might respond with their own tariffs should the U.S. implement the IEEPA Duties after the 30-day pause. Similar threats have already surfaced from China, which announced retaliatory tariffs in direct response to U.S. trade measures. According to reports, China also launched export restrictions on key minerals and targeted specific U.S. companies in an escalating trade dispute. This situation underscores how interconnected trade and border security measures are globally, extending well beyond North America.

Impacts on Trade and Cross-Border Relations

The agreements with Canada and Mexico come at a critical time for regional trade. The USMCA was designed to boost North America’s economy, ensure fair labor standards, and strengthen the agricultural sector. However, persistent threats of tariffs and the shifting focus toward stricter border policies could disrupt these objectives.

In the short term, the agreements offer a means to address immediate security threats and illegal immigration. Still, the risk of undermining trade progress remains, especially if extended tariff threats damage trust between the countries. Policymakers will need to strike the right balance between securing the borders and maintaining the economic benefits of free trade under the USMCA.

Conclusion

The agreements between the United States 🇺🇸, Canada 🇨🇦, and Mexico 🇲🇽 signal a major effort to address border security challenges, including illegal immigration and the rising fentanyl crisis. Mexico’s deployment of 10,000 National Guard members and Canada’s measures like appointing a fentanyl czar and targeting Mexican cartels demonstrate their willingness to cooperate under economic pressure. However, the sustainability of these efforts is still in question.

While these steps help temporarily avert the trade risks of looming tariffs, their long-term effects remain unclear. Border challenges—whether related to illegal crossings, drug trafficking, or firearms smuggling—are complex and require more than temporary fixes. As negotiations continue, the three governments face the difficult task of balancing security, immigration control, and trade relationships in a way that benefits all parties.

For further details about border initiatives and immigration laws, readers can visit the official U.S. Customs and Border Protection website here. Sources like VisaVerge.com also provide insightful updates on immigration developments and their global impacts. The next few months will be key to determining whether these agreements foster meaningful progress or merely offer a fleeting solution.

Learn Today

Fentanyl → A powerful synthetic opioid, often trafficked illegally, responsible for many overdose deaths in the United States.
Remain in Mexico Policy → U.S. immigration rule requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for their court hearings in the U.S.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) → A U.S. law granting the president authority to regulate trade during national emergencies.
National Guard → A reserve military force deployed for domestic operations like border security and disaster response, overseen by national governments.
USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) → A trade deal promoting fair commerce between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada, replacing NAFTA in 2020.

This Article in a Nutshell

Border Tensions: Tariffs Spark Urgent Agreements
Under tariff threats, the U.S., Mexico, and Canada forged border security deals tackling illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling. Mexico deployed 10,000 troops; Canada pledged joint action against cartels. While these measures temporarily ease trade risks, experts warn lasting solutions demand deeper collaboration as smugglers adapt and economic strains persist.
— By VisaVerge.com