Millions Entering US Without Biometric Screening Amid Security Concerns

From 2020 to 2023, the U.S. State Department issued over 7.1 million nonimmigrant visas without mandatory biometric screening due to COVID-19. This raised national security concerns as some immigration officers were unaware of the waivers. Technological and procedural shortcomings further complicated biometric verification, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced funding and inter-agency coordination.

Oliver Mercer
By Oliver Mercer - Chief Editor 11 Min Read

Key Takeaways:

  • From 2020-2023, over 7.1 million nonimmigrant visas issued without mandatory interviews and biometric screenings due to COVID-19 waivers.
  • Security concerns emerged as DHS IG revealed unknown extent of individuals bypassing biometrics, critical for CBP officers’ evaluations.
  • Technological and procedural shortcomings identified by DHS IG, with limited biometric capabilities at vehicle entry points complicating traveler verification.

How Many Nonimmigrant Visas Were Issued Without Proper Biometric Screening?

From 2020 through 2023, the U.S. State Department, in coordination with top U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) leadership, issued at least 7.1 million nonimmigrant visas without conducting the required in-person consular interviews and biometric screening. This alarming revelation underscores potential national security risks due to gaps in proper procedures and technology at U.S. ports of entry (POE).

Millions Entering US Without Biometric Screening Amid Security Concerns
Millions Entering US Without Biometric Screening Amid Security Concerns

What Led to the Waiver of Biometric Screening Requirements?

The waiver of biometric screening requirements, including fingerprint collection, was implemented as a temporary measure due to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The State Department argued that the vast number of visa applications during the pandemic overwhelmed their resources, prompting the need for waivers. Specifically, individuals applying for nonimmigrant visas for tourism, medical treatment, business, temporary work, and study were affected.

Did the Waivers Compromise National Security?

Concerns about national security grew as DHS Inspector General (IG) revealed that the full extent of individuals who avoided biometric screening remains unknown. The IG disclosed this in a memorandum to Troy Miller, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). “Because consular interviews can be an important mechanism for collecting information from visa applicants to verify identity and determine admissibility before they arrive in the United States, having knowledge of who was waived and who was not could allow CBP officers to make more informed decisions,” the IG stated.

Why Were Some CBP Officers Unaware of the Waiver Program?

The biometric and interview waiver program ended in December 2023. Notably, the Department of Homeland Security’s IG discovered that some U.S. ports of entry’s CBP Office of Field Operations (OFO) port directors were unaware of this program for up to four years. Despite the State Department only starting to provide CBP with information on visa holders who did not receive interviews or biometric collection in March, this information is crucial for officers conducting secondary screenings at POEs.

How Are CBP Officers Affected?

CBP officers at U.S. ports of entry are responsible for verifying whether a person seeking entry into the U.S. is who they claim to be. This process typically involves capturing and cross-referencing biometrics, physically reviewing identification like passports or permanent resident cards, and querying biographic and biometric data against DHS and other federal databases. The oversight of waived biometrics complicates their task, raising questions about the officers’ capacity to identify passengers who may pose security threats.

Are There Procedural and Technological Shortcomings?

The DHS IG uncovered additional concerns regarding CBP’s procedures and technology. It was noted that CBP lacks the capability for biometric matching of travelers arriving in vehicles at U.S. land ports of entry. Instead, they rely on facial comparison biometric capability deployed only in pedestrian lanes. Manual verification of travelers’ identities processed in vehicle lanes introduces inefficiencies and heightens security risks.

What About the Expansion of Interview Waiver Categories?

In December 2023, the State Department and DHS agreed to expand the categories of visas and applicants eligible for consular interview waivers starting January 1, 2024. Although the biometric waiver program was terminated, DHS’s IG insisted that CBP officers need full awareness of who has been granted waivers for proper security screening. There remains a lack of comprehensive data on visa holders who received waivers prior to March 2024, forcing CBP to reassess their risk evaluation approaches continuously.

Why Has the Collection of Biometric Data Been Challenging?

Capturing biometrics for travelers in vehicles at land POEs has faced a myriad of challenges, from technical difficulties like light glare and dirty windshields to human behaviors such as passengers looking away or wearing obstructive items like sunglasses or hats. Although Congress initially funded the Biometric Entry-Exit Program with up to $1 billion, only a fraction of this amount was collected, significantly affecting the program’s deployment at land ports.

What Are Lawmakers and Former Officials Saying?

Members of both House and Senate committees overseeing the State Department expressed concerns over the lack of supplemental funding requests to address the personnel and resource shortfall. According to these committee members, the inability to perform biometric screenings constitutes a national security risk. Lawmakers were especially critical of the current CBP leadership’s response to the IG’s findings, with one unnamed member reportedly stating during a closed-door meeting, “It’s not at all adequate.”

How Are Current Budget Constraints Affecting Biometric Implementation?

CBP’s FY 2025 budget request anticipates receiving approximately $448 million over the next ten years from the fees collected for H-1B and L-1 visas by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This funding projection is substantially lower than the initially expected $1 billion needed for deploying and maintaining full biometric operations through FY 2027. The USCIS’s collection shortfall is attributed to factors such as companies forming subsidiaries to avoid fees, revised hiring policies, fewer companies being subjected to fees than anticipated, and COVID-19-related effects.

What Is CBP’s Strategy Moving Forward?

While the CBP leadership’s stance remains that the waived biometric screening doesn’t impact their screening protocol, the DHS IG argues otherwise. The IG emphasized the importance of providing port directors and frontline officers with access to information on waivers to enhance security measures. Furthermore, CBP plans to collaborate with the National Targeting Center to identify risks associated with visa holders who had their interviews waived.

Will DHS Address the Identified Gaps Moving Forward?

Until DHS resolves the issues highlighted by the IG, including biometric screening inadequacies and the technological limitations at land POEs, there remains a risk of admitting individuals who could pose significant threats to national security. As reported by VisaVerge.com, the coordination and technological advancements necessary for secure and efficient traveler processing continue to face budgetary and operational challenges.

What Can Congress Do?

With the projected funding falling short, the question remains whether Congress will step in to provide direct appropriations necessary for the full deployment of biometric capabilities at land POEs. The urgency of addressing these security gaps cannot be overstated, and proactive legislative measures are imperative.

For additional authoritative information on biometric entry and exit procedures, visit the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s official website.


The insights presented in this article underscore the multifaceted nature of biometric screening and visa waivers within the U.S. immigration framework. Ensuring national security requires not just technological upgrades but also vigilant procedural practices and comprehensive inter-agency cooperation. The lessons learned over the past four years serve as a critical reminder of the intricate balance between facilitating lawful entry and safeguarding the nation against potential threats.

Learn Today:

Glossary of Immigration Terms

  1. Nonimmigrant Visa
    • A type of visa granted to foreign nationals who wish to enter the United States temporarily for reasons such as tourism, medical treatment, business, temporary work, or study.
  2. Biometric Screening
    • A security measure that involves the collection and analysis of physical characteristics like fingerprints and facial recognition to verify an individual’s identity.
  3. Ports of Entry (POE)
    • Designated locations where individuals can legally enter a country. In the U.S., these include airports, seaports, and land border crossings where Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers conduct entry screenings.
  4. Consular Interview
    • An in-person meeting between a visa applicant and a consular officer to assess the applicant’s eligibility for a visa based on documentation and any necessary interview responses.
  5. Inspector General (IG)
    • A government official responsible for auditing and investigating a department’s operations and practices, ensuring they follow the law and function efficiently. In this context, the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General evaluates and reports on immigration processes and protocols.

This Article In A Nutshell:

From 2020 to 2023, over 7.1 million nonimmigrant visas were issued without required biometric screening due to COVID-19 challenges. This temporary measure has raised national security concerns, highlighting procedural gaps at U.S. ports of entry that need addressing to ensure comprehensive immigration oversight and safety.
— By VisaVerge.com

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only. If you reference or use any content from this article, please attribute it to VisaVerge.com by including a link to the original source. We appreciate your adherence to our content usage policies and your commitment to giving proper credit.

Read more

Share This Article
Oliver Mercer
Chief Editor
Follow:
As the Chief Editor at VisaVerge.com, Oliver Mercer is instrumental in steering the website's focus on immigration, visa, and travel news. His role encompasses curating and editing content, guiding a team of writers, and ensuring factual accuracy and relevance in every article. Under Oliver's leadership, VisaVerge.com has become a go-to source for clear, comprehensive, and up-to-date information, helping readers navigate the complexities of global immigration and travel with confidence and ease.
Leave a Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments